I'm confused as well about the representation part. At one point through the tweets it almost appeared as though she was referring to findings the anthropologist made and not her own. Even reading the news articles tonight show a quote from her where she refers to "she". I would think if it was herself making those findings it would be "I"
“She determined the majority of the bone fragments she had examined were animal, but there were fragments within there that she felt could be human.
“There were, I believe, at least one or two fragments she felt could have been from a child under 5"
http://globalnews.ca/news/3218435/d...rial-medical-examiner-testimony/?sf53910823=1
I always thought in trials the person discovering the evidence and making the findings had to testify for themselves. Didn't think you can give third party testimony.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk