Deceased/Not Found Canada - Alvin, 66, & Kathy Liknes, 53, Nathan O'Brien, 5, Calgary, 30 Jun 2014 - #28

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Valerie Fortney ‏@ValFortney 1m1 minute ago
Judge just demanded Sanders confer with Ross for 5 minutes. #Garland


Sanders - you are beyond help.
 
Bryan LabbyVerified account ‏@CBCBryan 1m1 minute ago
Sanders directed to speak with Ross outside the courtroom for 5 min. And now we wait. #Garland


So basically, as I see it, JudgeG is so pissed at Sanders for being an idiot, he had him/her leave the courtroom with Ross to get his/her head on.
Interesting strategy Ross & Sanders.
 
Valerie Fortney ‏@ValFortney 1m1 minute ago
Judge just demanded Sanders confer with Ross for 5 minutes. #Garland


Sanders - you are beyond help.

I've been away all morning and I'm just catching up. Who is Sanders? Where is Ross? Defense has just turned this into a ***** show. They look as incompetent as their client is evil.
 
Okay, stop with the $hit show, the family has been through enough. Just lock him up and throw away the key.

Sorry for the attitude, but Kathy, Alvin, and Nathan weren't treated with respect and dignity....why should this monster be?
 
Lucas MeyerVerified account ‏@meyer_lucas 1m1 minute ago
Defence is back to discuss legal matter. #Garland #yyc

Reid FiestVerified account ‏@ReidFiest 2m2 minutes ago
Defence is back. #Garland
 
This is desperate and sad, Lutz was probably responsible for giving Ross his meds ....

Sent from my SM-G920W8 using Tapatalk

I admit I am horrible with names but I am so confused by the lawyer situation this morning. Has Sanders ever been in court before today?
 
Sanders will have to leave Alberta for a new job. Ross and Lutz shoud never have allowed this to happen though. Talk about being set up for failure. Publicly.
MOO
 
I've been away all morning and I'm just catching up. Who is Sanders? Where is Ross? Defense has just turned this into a ***** show. They look as incompetent as their client is evil.
Sanders is standing in for Lutz who was not available, Ross is there too but I fear he's off his meds ...

Sent from my SM-G920W8 using Tapatalk
 
I admit I am horrible with names but I am so confused by the lawyer situation this morning. Has Sanders ever been in court before today?

No. Lutz had to be away and for some reason they decided Sanders would be an asset to have in court. What a misfire.
 
[video=twitter;832673890711199744]https://twitter.com/CBCCalgary/status/832673890711199744[/video]
 
I just caught up too so apologies for a belated legal question about the victim impact statements:

It seems that judges are supposed to remove material from victim impact statements when it won't be "helpful" to them in deciding sentencing. But the judges have to read that material first in order to decide to strike it from the impact statements, so what's the point really of removing it? They've already read it! No offense to Justice Gates, who is my hero of the day, but that just seems nonsensical to me.
 
It's like even the defense lawyers have conceded DG did everything he was accused of but if he get's the consecutive sentences, well that looks bad for business for their firm so they are fighting it - not really out of any love for DG but to prevent loss of future clients.
 
Sanders is standing in for Lutz who was not available, Ross is there too but I fear he's off his meds ...

Sent from my SM-G920W8 using Tapatalk

Is there any way DG could be dictating some of this craziness? Can he direct his defense lawyers how to argue during his sentencing? I just don't understand how any capable defense lawyers would allow this $hit show to happen.
 

No. Lutz had to be away and for some reason they decided Sanders would be an asset to have in court. What a misfire.

Big mistake. HUGE. They all look like idiots. and that's really the nicest way I can put it.
 
I just caught up too so apologies for a belated legal question about the victim impact statements:

It seems that judges are supposed to remove material from victim impact statements when it won't be "helpful" to them in deciding sentencing. But the judges have to read that material first in order to decide to strike it from the impact statements, so what's the point really of removing it? They've already read it! No offense to Justice Gates, who is my hero of the day, but that just seems nonsensical to me.

This is fantastic.
Totally never even thought of that.
 
Just a quick search, Alias Amelia Sanders, no website??? She was Dustin Paxton's defense attorney

Sent from my SM-G920W8 using Tapatalk
 
Valerie Fortney ‏@ValFortney 51s52 seconds ago
Judge lets Sanders make her arguments; says court can interpret the Criminal Code section so consecutive provisions don't apply #Garland

Lucas MeyerVerified account ‏@meyer_lucas 1m1 minute ago
Sanders is asking the court to interpret a part of the criminal code so that consecutive provisions don't apply #Garland #yyc
 
Valerie Fortney ‏@ValFortney 56s56 seconds ago
#Justice Gates asks Ross if any mitigating evidence; he says he has already made his submission #Garland

Bill GravelandVerified account ‏@BillGraveland 1m1 minute ago
Justice Gates is now asking if there are any"mitigating factors" in this case. #Garland

Kevin MartinVerified account ‏@KMartinCourts 1m1 minute ago
Defence counsel Alias Sanders says it's not clear whether the criminal code allows for consecutive parole ineligibilities. #Garland


BBM: Ross wants no part of this chicken outfit
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
118
Guests online
181
Total visitors
299

Forum statistics

Threads
608,708
Messages
18,244,377
Members
234,434
Latest member
ProfKim
Back
Top