Lalalacasbah
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2014
- Messages
- 3,007
- Reaction score
- 6,081
Respectfully snipped:
I always wondered why the prosecutor argued that the victims were alive at the farm. Perhaps it was to bypass the search warrant oversight. If it was believed that the victims were alive, then perhaps they had an urgent need to search the property without a warrant. However, given all the blood at the home, evidence that bodies were dragged out, and the time that had passed, was it realistic to believe that they were alive? I never believed that they were alive at the farm, and no evidence was presented that they were alive at the farm. This warrant issue might be why the prosecution boldly claimed that they were alive without presenting supportive evidence.
I thought prosecutors thought victims were alive because they found Nathan's bloody hand print on the wall and were alluding to him balancing himself if unsteady. DG could've beaten them unconscious but not dead although I've always hoped they were deceased before reaching the farm. I do see your point though Otto, could well be a legal strategy for the warrant situation. Ugh, not sure I want to even re-visit this case. Still so sad.