<modsnip>
I also take issue with the Judge parsing out each of the murders into separate events so he could order consecutive sentencing. It strikes me as an emotional reaction rather than a logical one. Sentencing like this sets a dangerous precedent that I would not like to see in place. For example, Matthew de Groot murdered five people at a party. It could be argued that he murdered each one for a different reason, and therefore he should have five life sentences. The criminal justice system in Canada is premised on rehabilitation, not punishment, yet Gates has crossed the line to ordering punitive sentences.
The jail is full of people who are either charged with, or guilty of, criminal offences. They are 'evil', to use Justice Gates' word. For any of those convicted criminals to think that their violence is a notch above someone else's violence seems like wrong thinking.
Matthew DeGrood was not convicted of murder at all - he was found not criminally responsible - so I'm not sure how your example is relevant. You are also incorrect in your assertion that Canadian Justice is only about rehabilitation. That's simply not true. Sentencing people to life in prison for vicious, violent crimes is not a new thing - and there is a very strong punitive element to that. Punishment is most certainly a prominent component of the Canadian Justice System.
<modsnip>