GUILTY Canada - Amber Kirwan, 19, New Glasgow, NS, 9 Oct 2011 - #2

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Sorry Truth, I wasnt accusing you of truncating my post. I meant that somehow as I was typing my post, I deleted part of it. My computer crashed so I am forced to use my phone with my big thumbs! :doh:

And I agree with you about Mason. I do not condone what he did at all. I remember the article you are referring to. I hate it when stuff on the web disappears! Mason was on my radar from the get go but I now think they got the right guy.

I actually tried to stay away from the trial as I was worried it would set me back. I was quite confident he would be found guilty but started to get anxious on Mon. In the end it was all good. Actually it was great. I got a call with a job offer only a few minutes after the sentencing! I have been off work for a year so it is a relief.
I apologize, too. I'm so affected when I hear his name, that I can't even see straight.

I'm sorry to hear about your loss, and pleased for you that you are doing better now.
3f925d88d7a3411d3ceb6081fb734fdbab94a19.gif
 
Falconer murdered Robert LeBlanc in 1998 and Amber in 2011, so according to the following he is definitely ineligible for parole for 15 years.

After that, he can apply, though; am I correct in my reading of that?

When Parliament abolished capital punishment and introduced mandatory life sentences for murder, it was felt that if rehabilitation was to be successful, persons sentenced to life imprisonment needed some hope of being released during their lifetime. As a result, section 745.6 of the Criminal Code, the so-called faint-hope clause, was introduced. It makes it possible for convicted murderers to apply for a reduction in the number of years they must serve in prison before being able to apply for parole. This application can be made after they have served 15 years of their sentence. All applications are screened so that only those having a reasonable prospect of success will actually receive a hearing. Further, persons who have committed more than one murder after January 1997 are ineligible for a section 745.6 hearing — they do not have any right to apply for a hearing to reduce the time they must serve before applying for parole.

http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/cj-jp/victim/guide/secm.html
 
Falconer murdered Robert LeBlanc in 1998 and Amber in 2011, so according to the following he is definitely ineligible for parole for 15 years.

After that, he can apply, though; am I correct in my reading of that?

Ineligible means not eligible, so no, he can't apply for parole until his full sentence is served.
 
Ineligible means not eligible, so no, he can't apply for parole until his full sentence is served.
Thank you, Musicaljoke!

LOL I do know that ineligible means not eligible; however, I also know that not too many of these guys have to serve their full sentence.
 
Okay. I get it now. While the date of Amber's murder would have technically allowed him to apply, he won't qualify because of the previous murder he committed in 1998.

Sorry, I should have had more coffee.

I pray he will have to do the full 25 and maybe he will make some kind of trouble for himself and have to do more.


Offenders who committed their offence after December 2, 2011 are no longer eligible to apply for the faint hope clause. However, those convicted of offences that occurred prior to that date may still be eligible.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faint_hope_clause

Section 745.6 prohibits any person convicted of more than one murder, where one or more of the murders was committed after January 9, 1997, from applying for judicial review. Multiple murderers must serve the entire parole ineligibility period of 25 years before being able to apply for parole to the National Parole Board.
http://publications.gc.ca/collections/Collection/J2-291-2001E.pdf
 
Hi, Hestia47!

When I click on your link it takes me to a home page for New Glasgow News; but I can't find anything specific to this case, except for a slide show of trial sketches.

I Googled to see if I could find anything that way, and I came up with an article entitled: "Falconer's family still has questions."

However, when I click on that, I get: "The page you tried to retrieve does not exist! [410]"

It says the article was only released six hours ago. :(

If I'm on the right track, and just missing the link, would you consider sending it again?

I would like to read it.

I came up with the following link that only has a picture and a short caption, but no write-up.

http://www.ngnews.ca/photo/Falconer-family-2544439
 
The link Hiesta posted was the NG News article regarding Mason's charge. It is not as detailed as the one we both saw that can no longer be found on the web.

http://m.ngnews.ca/News/Local/2012-...d-with-threatening-woman,-possessing-weapon/1

As for the one that the Falconer family has questions... Apparently the article was posted for less than 30 minutes and was removed. I heard the NG News is going to run an edited version next week. I read the phantom article and IIRC the family says they are not happy with Taylor's representation, the trial should have been moved and they don't think he did it. They are trying to decide if they are going to hire a new layer for appeal.
 
The link Hiesta posted was the NG News article regarding Mason's charge. It is not as detailed as the one we both saw that can no longer be found on the web.

http://m.ngnews.ca/News/Local/2012-...d-with-threatening-woman,-possessing-weapon/1

As for the one that the Falconer family has questions... Apparently the article was posted for less than 30 minutes and was removed. I heard the NG News is going to run an edited version next week. I read the phantom article and IIRC the family says they are not happy with Taylor's representation, the trial should have been moved and they don't think he did it. They are trying to decide if they are going to hire a new layer for appeal.
Thanks, Kileyray.

I cleared my cache and everything, but both links take me to the same "front" page.

Thanks for the info on what Falconer's family has to say.

Sounds like they think there is going to be an appeal.
 
IMO there will be appeals. I also believe Falconer will never be released. If his Family wants to waste their time and money have at er LOL. Not judging but they didn't strike me as having "that" kind of money. Sure hope they don't end up broke and broken. Denial can be devastating.
 
www.ngnews.ca/News/Local/2014-02-03...ere-are-still-too-many-unanswered-questions/1

This article is NOT entirely the same as the one that was posted by NG News on Friday and then immediately taken offline. Some remarks were edited out... Somebody doesn't want the falconers speaking their minds ......
From the link:

Quote: Dalhousie law professor Rob Currie, speaking in general terms, said an appeal of any verdict can only be made if the judge made an error in how he or she instructed the jury about the law, if the judge made an error in admitting evidence or if the jury made a decision that was completely inconsistent with the evidence. He said the defence has to consider whether there are any such errors and whether they’re significant enough to have affected the outcome of the trial.
http://www.ngnews.ca/News/Local/201...ere-are-still-too-many-unanswered-questions/1

► Based on the above, I don't think we are going to see an appeal.

I would have preferred the full article. I don't think we need to edit what is being said.

I know they are hurting. Of course they are. Sadly, all those people in prison right now are someone's sons and daughters.
-----


Also from the article, and also noteworthy is the following:

Quote: Scott said Chris fished with him and he farmed with Scotty. He also worked as a labourer for a carpentry company until he got laid off in the summer. He told his father he had another line on a job before he was picked up by police again on the parole violation in November 2011.
http://www.ngnews.ca/News/Local/201...ere-are-still-too-many-unanswered-questions/1

► So, he was unemployed at the time of Amber's murder; and had been since earlier in the summer. Contrary to what persisted on Facebook. :)
-----


And this:

Quote: "Why would Chris take her, if he did it, out to his sister's, who he loved, and mess up her life? Why take the body and bury it in his father's back yard? There are other places.
http://www.ngnews.ca/News/Local/201...ere-are-still-too-many-unanswered-questions/1

► The majority of criminals commit their dastardly deeds on soil they are familiar with.
-----


This:

Quote: The cellphone records say he was in New Glasgow and then Pictou that night, but so were a lot of other people."
http://www.ngnews.ca/News/Local/201...ere-are-still-too-many-unanswered-questions/1

► The cellphone records are much stronger evidence than he wants to believe. The records were from Falconer's phone; they were tracking his movements. Specifically.
-----


And finally the following jumps out at me:

Quote: Nov. 2011
Chris Falconer is arrested charged with unauthorized possession of a restricted firearm and possession of drugs.

http://www.ngnews.ca/News/Local/201...ere-are-still-too-many-unanswered-questions/1

► This is the first time I'm reading in print about the unauthorized posession of a firearm. I read previously in main stream media articles that he had bullets; and that he had a knife. They seemed to have dropped the bullets and the knife, and have added the gun, at last.

It would be easier to respect what we read if they tried to keep it consistent.

I do believe he had a firearm, though.

There was another murder--a shooting--in that small town; a few weeks after Amber's murder; but before they revoked Falconer's parole. It remains unsolved. :(
 
http://m.ngnews.ca/News/Local/2014-02-26/article-3628444/Falconer-will-appeal-murder-conviction/1


The Nova Scotia Court of Appeals has received a prisoner appeal by Christopher Alexander Falconer convicted of first degree murder in the death of Amber Kirwan.

This is the start of the appeal process for Falconer who was convicted on Jan. 28 of the 19-year-old Pictou County woman’s murder in 2011.

The Crown has up to 80 days to respond to the appeal, which will be handled in the appeals court of Nova Scotia.

Right now, Falconer is acting on his own behalf, but the process could move quicker if he receives legal counsel.

After he was convicted, Falconer's family expressed concern about how the case had been handled.

Falconer's father, Scott, said Wednesday afternoon that his family is pleased the appeal application has been filed. He said the appeal is based on the lack the evidence that was presented during the trial yet still resulted in a conviction by the 12 member jury.

Scott said his son is currently without legal representation but that could change in the future.

Sent from my SGH-I717M using Tapatalk
 
University study looking for people who followed Christoper Falconer murder trial online.

http://metronews.ca/news/halifax/10...owed-christoper-falconer-murder-trial-online/

A local university study wants to hear from people who were glued to their computers or mobile phones during the month of January to follow the Christopher Falconer murder trial.

Dr. Margo Watt and forensic psychology students at St. Francis Xavier University are currently in the midst of collecting information from people who followed the first-degree murder trial in Pictou through social media.
 
My apologies because I have been so absent lately that I should have taken a look to refresh myself on how to add a link.

Falconer did appeal and it has been heard. The Chief Justice is reserving judgement and will hand it down at a "later date." Good grief! :gaah:

Let us not forget that Amber was this man's second victim.

Video at link - Quote: "Chief Justice Michael MacDonald reserved judgment after hearing the arguments." End Quote
http://atlantic.ctvnews.ca/chris-falconer-appeals-murder-conviction-in-amber-kirwan-case-1.2654814
 
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/christopher-falconer-murder-appeal-amber-kirwan-1.3315521

The lawyer for a Nova Scotia man appealing his first-degree murder conviction in the death of Amber Kirwan says the Crown and trial judge made errors in the way they described evidence to the jury.

Falconer originally filed his appeal based on fact the trial should have been held in a different venue. His lawyer changed those grounds.

Falconer's appeal lawyer argues there is a difference between acknowledging texts and conceding they are in fact truth.

Falconer's lawyer says his family believes he was set up, and they suggested that in phone calls.


http://atlantic.ctvnews.ca/chris-falconer-appeals-murder-conviction-in-amber-kirwan-case-1.2654814
During the original trial, the court heard that Falconer had sent a text message to his step-sister Alice Meier, saying he was at the camper the night Kirwan disappeared, and that he dropped off some items there.

"There is a strange aspect of attending a property that's not yours and you're not in control of, presumably with a victim, knowing the occupants could return at any moment," said Seshagiri.

Crown prosecutor Tim O'Leary said the jury had viewed the texts and were capable of understanding what was factual in them, and what aspects they could interpret.

He said the judge didn't need to give further instruction on this evidence, other than what he provided in the charge to the jury.

"It was undisputed evidence," he said, referring to Falconer's presence at the camper.

O'Leary said the expert evidence provide by the toxicologists and other experts was subject to cross examination, and the jury was able to consider their validity.

"In this case, the jury was ... adequately, but not perfectly, instructed and the appellant had a fair trial and the jury was not misled about any factual issues," he said.

Chief Justice Michael MacDonald reserved judgment after hearing the arguments.

I can't find anything after this. Did the judge rule yet? :waiting:
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
221
Guests online
1,717
Total visitors
1,938

Forum statistics

Threads
599,353
Messages
18,094,905
Members
230,852
Latest member
dinkeydave
Back
Top