My replies in red.
We have all read this--the signs of double homicide versus murder/suicide: Their coat sleeves being pulled down tightly behind their backs limiting their arm movements, Honey having signs of fighting and being bloodied before being hung up to the railing, their wrists showing signs of being bound at one time and no binding found at the house, the belt loop from Barry's neck to the railing not being capable of the force for self hanging, Barry's composed legs with feet crossed, and eye glasses undisturbed being atypical if not impossible in a self hanging.
A couple of things: I don't believe the jackets were tightly behind their backs, the description I've heard was "loosely behind their backs. To me this suggests suicide more than murder, as many "how to" articles suggest securing the hands before a suicidal hanging. As for their wrists, that came from Dr Chaisson, who didn't even examine the actual markings (as the actual coroner had removed the skin for testing). Now I'm not saying he's right or wrong, but let's not forget that Greenspan and his crew were being paid to discredit any notion of murder/suicide.
TPS obviously agreed with the second autopsies which had to be justified by forensic science, and approved by the head coroner for the record. Obviously, any recorded garbage science done for ulterior motives could be discredited by other forensic pathologists.
Did they? Or were TPS looking for an out to oblige the political requests on behalf of the family. From what I understand, the actual coroner was undecided. The opinion of Chaisson, may have just been the ammunition that the chief needed to reverse the direction of the case. In this sort of scenario, nobody is lying, and the direction of the case is decided by the combined information of two pathologists. The fact that the one with the strongest opinion was not impartial was irrelevant. Even if they are wrong, no danger to the public and nobody is getting away with anything.
There are no reported incidences of Barry ever being violent toward anyone in his life, let alone any signs of domestic violence or abuse. The only allegation came from KW who failed a polygraph test directly related to this allegation. (Barry asked him decades ago to find somebody to kill Honey).
This is a typical response, however many acts of spousal homicide are met with claims that there was never any signs of violence between them. The one thing that I have heard is that Barry had a temper, whether his wife was ever the target of that temper is unknown.
It goes without question that Barry had many enemies due to his ruthless business practices and his penchant for dealing with undesirable, scummy people--all deemed motives for murder.
Barry was a businessman. The head of a huge company. Lawsuits are just part of the game. Was he killed over a lawsuit? Maybe, maybe not, but I do not see how anybody involved in a lawsuit with Apotex would benefit from Barry's death? Any lawsuits would continue. And what possible reason would they have for killing Honey as well?
And finally, any cover-up of a police investigation's determination of m/s would have to involve the collusion of so many different professional people and departments, all willing to accept corruption and risk ruining their careers (some stellar, respected careers) so that Barry Sherman doesn't get a bad reputation for killing his wife? The m/s scenario hasn't passed the rational thinking test imo. I'm surprised that it is still being considered.
Again, I don't buy that. As in any large company, you do what your boss tells you. In this case, Saunders, armed with the inconclusive coroner report, and the biased second autopsy, has enough ammo to persuade Gomes to make an announcement. Lets face it, nobody can say at that point with 100% certainty that it is with M/M or M/S, so there is no reason for Gomes to object. Many times in my daily business dealings I have followed the direction of my boss even though I do not agree with the decision, and so long as they are not asking me to do something illegal, I will always follow their direction. And it seemed to pay off for Gomes a year later.