I had wondered same thing, ie perhaps TPS knew (from the first autopsy findings) that it was a double murder, however they wanted to keep it secret for investigative purposes, so they went with the flow of what was already 'out there', being stated all over MSM - didn't say it was MM, but also didn't correct the wide-range perception and continued reporting that it was a M/S.
But then I corrected any such thoughts, because there's just no way TPS could/would have allowed MSM to continue thrashing BS's name all over MSM, suggesting he was a murderer. They can't say they're not seeking suspects, and at the same time believe it was a double murder. It seems like they just royally screwed up (or the pathologist did), only to be corrected when the independent, second autopsies were performed.
Considering that police made statements to MSM (on Friday, the very same day the bodies were found),
before autopsies were performed (on Saturday, the following day), that they were not seeking any outstanding suspect(s), for me, it begs to understand how much the pathologist's findings are influenced by police perceptions and direction. (A horrible thought.)
Interesting that the latest article states that in the independent second set of autopsies, the pathologist determined they were likely not strangled with the belts, but with something else, and then hung with the belts afterward. It would be awfully difficult for a dead person to stage his own hanging with a belt after he's already dead by strangulation with something else?
https://www.thestar.com/news/canada...d-from-murder-suicide-to-double-homicide.html
Article Dec.15/17 (before autopsies)
http://nationalpost.com/pmn/news-pm...ound-dead-police-call-the-deaths-suspicious-2