Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good question ..... for sexual motives Christine and Audrey are as different as night and day ..... but that may not be the only motive in those cases .... there was also a sadistic hatred as can be seen by the multiple stab wounds and mutilations on both victims .... that is the common denominator (sadistic hatred) rather than just sexual deviance so who the victim is is not as important as simply having a victim who is female.You’re right. He did live close. Although “close” to one might seem far to another. I’m not an expert on killers, so I’m wondering if anyone knows, would a person who is into little girls, also be interested in an older woman?
Where was the evidence that she rode her bike to the store? I don’t think anyone saw her with her bike that day. On the contrary:
(xv) Robert Atkinson - Atkinson’s Evidence
On October 3, 1984, Robert Atkinson and his friend Doug Thompson were commuting to their work at a manufacturing plant in Holland Landing, a village approximately six miles away from Queensville. Their shift was to commence at 4:30 p.m. They were proceeded east on the Queensville Sideroad. They stopped at the stop sign at the corner of Leslie Street and Queensville Sideroad for approximately two to three minutes to allow the heavy traffic on Leslie Street to pass.
I don't know if this is a typo, but Holland Landing is west of Queensville, so if Atkinson was on Queensville Sideroad heading east, as the quotation states, he was heading away from his workplace, not heading toward it. So I wonder if he meant west, not east. I was just at that intersection 20 minutes ago bringing my son home from work except now there are lights, not a stop sign.
I’m glad to see that you stepped in sillybilly.
I’ve spent many hours in the past, online with Kenny...and with the recent announcement of Hoover’s guilt, I feel nothing but relief for him and his parents...at least they know who.
I can’t imagine their torment though, now, knowing it was a friend/coworker...and really seeing how the cops blew this case right from day one.
Kenny’s mom had talked on the phone to Hoover’s wife that morning....how hard did the cops investigate that family?
they couldn’t have...where the hell did the wife say HOOVer was all evening? What was his alibi for that night?
He lived in Toronto...that is not that close to Concession 4 and Simcoe...over an hour drive home.
He picked up Christine sometime after 4pm...what time did he get home... and why wasn’t he at work at that time of day?
Good question ..... for sexual motives Christine and Audrey are as different as night and day ..... but that may not be the only motive in those cases .... there was also a sadistic hatred as can be seen by the multiple stab wounds and mutilations on both victims .... that is the common denominator (sadistic hatred) rather than just sexual deviance so who the victim is is not as important as simply having a victim who is female.
I wonder if Hoover had a dark side nobody ever saw. It would be interesting to hear what family and people he was close to have to say about him.
Yes, I'm interested in all these things, too. I hope his ex-wife can provide a lot of insight, especially the details around the time of the disappearance. I don't see why she wouldn't be entirely forthcoming. They had been divorced for years and he is long gone now. She may be able to provide details about what led them to divorce and any mental health issues he may have had.I hope they will do a complete psychological profile on him based on his medical records and information gleaned about him. And then to inform the public — because for him to have avoided suspicion,we just need to know how somone like that went through life undetected. Do you think his ex wife will be forthcoming in what she knows? They reported the family was being cooperative. I wonder how honest and truthful she’ll be about all that she knew or even suspected about him, even things she saw before, during and after the event. Sometimes, people can’t be completely forthcoming when they feel they’ll be judged for not speaking up sooner. Not just his ex wife, but his kids must have observed certain behaviours in him. And how about his family of origin (siblings, cousins, etc). I often think of these psychopaths as loners but the reports say this guy had an active social life. I can’t imagine him socializing! I wonder what his upbringing was like.
I don't see why she wouldn't be entirely forthcoming. They had been divorced for years and he is long gone now. She may be able to provide details about what led them to divorce and any mental health issues he may have had.
It may take some time, though. Investigators probably have many people to question and sometimes people remember things gradually over time. This must be very overwhelming for his family, especially his kids.
Yes, I understand. The ex-wife or others may feel guilty if they did suspect him or saw warning signs and didn't take any action. Hopefully detectives can put their minds at ease and assure them that they will not be judged and they are just trying to put the pieces together.I guess where I was going here is that sometimes people might feel guilty for either having knowledge or susupecting their spouse (or family member) of something but not having addressed it. That might prevent full disclosure of certain relevant details from their fear of being judged by the public in this high profile case. For example, if he did come home later than usual that night and she remembers that, will she fear being judged for not suspecting him, and will her fear keep her from relaying the full truth. Hopefully a clear picture of him can be pieced together and I think TPS will do an excellent job this time.
I believe the BTK killer was also married with kids, and he lead a completely separate life from his family. Definitely a case I am going to look back into in regards to CH's behaviour, and how BTK's family described him.I hope they will do a complete psychological profile on him based on his medical records and information gleaned about him. And then to inform the public — because for him to have avoided suspicion,we just need to know how somone like that went through life undetected. Do you think his ex wife will be forthcoming in what she knows? They reported the family was being cooperative. I wonder how honest and truthful she’ll be about all that she knew or even suspected about him, even things she saw before, during and after the event. Sometimes, people can’t be completely forthcoming when they feel they’ll be judged for not speaking up sooner. Not just his ex wife, but his kids must have observed certain behaviours in him. And how about his family of origin (siblings, cousins, etc). I often think of these psychopaths as loners but the reports say this guy had an active social life. I can’t imagine him socializing! I wonder what his upbringing was like.
I believe the BTK killer was also married with kids, and he lead a completely separate life from his family. Definitely a case I am going to look back into in regards to CH's behaviour, and how BTK's family described him.
Jessop file: Why has it taken so long? | Bhavan Sodhi - The Lawyer's Daily
October 29, 2020
"Christine's mother and brother have since added their voices and lent their support to Innocence Canada's demand for a carefully targeted review. Janet and Kenneth Jessop say than an independant review is the only way to supply the answers they need, and the authorities must account for how Hoover, who took part in the searches in 1984 and attended her funeral and wake, was not investigated until now. "Our prayers were answered on Oct. 15, 2020. But the answer was not justice. It was a kick in the teeth. With that answer came a million questions," Mr. Jessop said in a statement sent to Innocence Canada."
...
"On Tues., Oct. 27, the Ontario Ministry of the Attorney-General stated that it would be inappropriate to conduct an inquiry while the investigation of Hoover is ongoing. Arguably, this perceived impropriety can be alleviated by the ministry making a firm commitment now to convene an independent review when the Hoover investigation has concluded."