MistyWaters
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2017
- Messages
- 12,003
- Reaction score
- 67,238
But if she felt her son was the one in danger why would she leave him. I suppose it will all come down to the sons statement at the end of the day but I think most people will do what it takes to protect their children regardless of consequences. And having a law degree and meeting other survivors probably means she knows what's at stake not escaping if that was the reason.
I also don't really get how the different surnames mean she planned it either. Both have been known since the start she just had a different name professionally. She's not exactly hid it.
Had she and her child not been found who but the child’s father would’ve become #1 public suspect which would place him wrongfully in danger. Setting up a false disappearance involves an element of maliciousness and spitefulness IMO. Her alternative was to leave a message saying she fled on her own accord and she and her child hasn’t met with any dire fate, but outlining the reasons.
I have no sympathy for people who falsely stage their disappearance as it leaves many, many victims involving unnecessary heartache. IMO.