Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks so much for triggering a Sopranos flashback....I agree. To continue with the movie analogy, it's kind of like, it was a thriller, edge of your seat type of movie, you were always left wondering what would happen next, you were glued to the screen in anticipation.... and then the movie cuts to a black screen and you have to make up your own mind of what actually happened. Darn!
Can someone please link where BS's uncle said they left with a lot of money? The video I watched of him was short and didn't include that. Thanks in advance!
I was just listening to an August 7th, CBC interview, the lawyer interviewed stated Mr Dycks body was burnt (see 4:55 mark). I have never heard this before. Anyone else?
https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/1584469571997
if the guys deaths were suicide wouldn't their gun be close and wouldn't the casings from death be close? if so why the metal detectors. I assume RCMP is looking for either a firearm or casings with metal detector. what else could be so important that would be metal?
Doroshenko is a DUI lawyer. I hardly think he has inside information. I think that he misspoke.
Doroshenko is a DUI lawyer. I hardly think he has inside information. I think that he misspoke.
Meanwhile, the lovely people of the community went about their daily lives on that stretch of road after the vehicle was found, picking berries, finding burnt and unburnt matches, keys, etc. Billy Beardy and TV reporters were there, too. Makes me wonder why they were allowed to be there if it was too dangerous for police.
I am surprised then, that the interviewer didn't pick up on it. That said, no one else in the media seems to have picked up on it either, so maybe I am hearing it wrongly.Doroshenko is a DUI lawyer. I hardly think he has inside information. I think that he misspoke.
I totally agree, and by "report" I meant whatever the RCMP decides to release, in whatever form they decide.I wouldn’t assume that this case will result in something like the Danforth report. That was a mass shooting of 15 people in the middle of Toronto. In my view, this is just not comparable. Not saying it won’t happen, but I think that we are talking apples and oranges.
Others may disagree.
This is the first time I have read that his body was not in the vicinity of the truck, although I am sure this is a well known fact.Other than gas and some groceries/food along the way, I don't imagine the cost of the trip was all that expensive. The truck/camper would be the biggest expense for fuel. Once they had the Rav 4 it would have been about $50-$60 or so to fill up with a distance of about 600-700km per tank. They had basically just hit the road when the couple was murdered so I highly doubt they were short on cash at that point. I don't think they were really ever short on cash IMO.
I also heard the lawyer say they found LD burnt and he goes on to say something about if he had been shot. LD's body was 2km away from the burnt truck.
The lawyer made that up IMOI heard it as we don't know how he was murdered, they found his body burnt, but if it's a bullet (that actually killed him)... Mr. Doroshenko certainly appears to know something here and this is only apparent my the way he says it. There is no "...if they found his body burnt." It makes sense of course that, if they torched their camper to destroy evidence, and had killed him, that they may well have tried to burn him as well. JMO I am interested in how others hear this.
Cell phones.
Exactly!Military knife is another guess.
This is the first time I have read that his body was not in the vicinity of the truck, although I am sure this is a well known fact.
This is the first time I have read that his body was not in the vicinity of the truck, although I am sure this is a well known fact.
Re the CBC interview just posted, I’ll repeat something that I suggested before.
I don’t think that the murder of Deese and Fowler was about money. Schmegelsky’s great uncle says they had “a fair amount of cash”. McLeod’s family is reasonably well off. If short, a call home would fix the problem.
I also think that they had a reasonable prospect, if they kept their cool and got rid of the murder weapon(s), of getting away with the initial murders.
Their decision to kill Dyck and steal his car sealed their fate, and surely they knew it.
Why? And why no note, assuming that there wasn’t one?
The whole thing sounds like a protracted suicide.