I imagine a judge asking "how and where were the keys you need to prove that KM and BS were at the scene found" ot "and how and where was the knife alleged to have been used to murder Mr Dyck (hypothetical) found?" the reply, "by a reporter, somewhere on the road, days after"....things that make you go hmmm.
Indeed.
My concern, back days ago when photos of the keys left at the scene were first posted, was that those keys might be a mix; some from back in Port Alberni, and maybe one from one or more of the victims. If so, those keys, plus the matchsticks also left uncollected (seen in a video interview at the site with Billy Beardy, who found the car burning) might well have been crucial evidence for a trial.
The fact they were left uncollected is indeed troubling. Chain-of-Evidence is only one issue. Contamination is another, the evidence vanishing is yet another. It is trivial to bag and tag a small piece of evidence. The fact potential evidence was left behind is indeed troubling from a procedural point of view.
I'll also refer people to the pictures of the burned truck to see what the oxidization of burned metal can quickly look like. As for the keys, the rust-colored areas are a concern, though not if, as reported, it had rained between the time of the fire and the day the photo was taken.
In the last thread, a member postulated that the keys could have been initially concealed in ash, then exposed by rain. I find this plausible, but still a bit troubling, especially in conjunction with reports of other things left behind. (matches, sardine tins, pork chops, etc).
This cannot be judged in context of the suspects being dead, because at the time, no one knew that. The evidence should have been collected.