MistyWaters
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2017
- Messages
- 12,003
- Reaction score
- 67,225
The claim was made that simply discussing the facts of the case in the media increases publicity and notoriety. That certain facts (although it is still unclear which ones) should not be discussed in the media at all because those facts are "dangerous."
What we do on true crime forums is discuss the facts of the case, often past the point where the general public has largely stopped paying attention. We also create a market for the media covering these cases, by reading and sharing articles, etc. Therefore if anyone is giving the media an impetus to keep covering the case, it is people like us. Sorry but that is just a fact.
I think you first brought up the topic of “discussion” in relation to the topic of notoriety and the RCMP’s expressed concern about copycat killings, so I’m not sure who’s claim it is that you’re referring to.
Notoriety/infamy of the perpetrators and reporting (or discussion) of the facts of a crime are not synonymous. However B&K are already yesterday’s news considering no new facts are being reported by the media...to not add notoriety to their names, assumably. And really, what more is there to be said given they’re not here to tell their own story in a courtroom.
Last edited: