Summersolstice
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2009
- Messages
- 1,599
- Reaction score
- 6
Today’s letters: Two reasons for no death penalty
Paul Russell October 29, 2010 – 7:00 am
Among the many comments for and against imposing the death penalty on Russell Williams for one important fact has been overlooked: The death penalty makes obtaining convictions more difficult.
As a courtroom illustrator for BCTV news, I had the dubious opportunity to observe Clifford Olson in the prisoner’s box more than 25 years ago. It is mostly forgotten now, but it was Olson himself who provided the evidence that would have convicted him, if he hadn’t changed his plea at trial. Just as Russell Williams led police to the body of Jessica Lloyd, it was Olson who led police to the bodies of his young victims.
Outside the courtroom I asked the chief investigating officer on Olson’s case if he thought Olson would have confessed if he’d known he would die for it. The officer reluctantly admitted that he most likely would not.
IIRC, DNA testing would have been in its infancy around the time CO was arrested. (At one time, all investigators had to go on was blood type. There are a lot of type Os out there.) I believe that the same could be said for criminal profiling, compared to what it is now. Even geographic profiling came later. CPIC was around, but ViCLAS came later. The computer era, the internet (with email) and advances in DNA technology have changed the landscape a great deal. Heck, were fax machines even in common use back then?
And another IIRC, didn't CO's wife get $100,000 ($10,000 per head for each victim named by CO) from the government?
Quite different from the case with RW, where LE had DNA evidence from the B&Es, and the tire tracks, etc. They already had enough to convict him, and were already searching intensively for JL, as Det-Sgt. Smyth said. His confession was more a matter of him being over a barrel, and wanting to make things better for his wife, IMO.