MistyWaters
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2017
- Messages
- 12,003
- Reaction score
- 67,218
Yes, that seems so unjust and so unkind and uncompassionate.. he was so 'fortunate' to have survived, especially after someone bringing danger directly to his door, when he didn't even really know the couple well at all. And then.. everything everywhere is about the victims who died, and nothing at all about those who survived. You would think as a bare minimum, our government could've purchased the nearby properties if the residents no longer could stomach living there, and as a bare minimum, that our govt could have provided some kind of ongoing financial assistance, if they were unable to function in a job.
That’s a very valid point, iirc there was others who survived but were injured. The mandate of the Red Cross is to “help people and communities in Canada and around the world in times of need and support them in strengthening their resilience.” Whether it be the govt or the Red Cross, if financial assistance to survivors who struggle to get on with their lives is completely overlooked that sends an awful message as it insinuates only if they are dead are they significant. JMO
Maybe that failure has been acknowledged?
From that same link above -
“The issue of supporting survivors is one she raised at the Mass Casualty Commission examining the tragedy.”