MADJGNLAW
Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2008
- Messages
- 5,525
- Reaction score
- -4
:snooty:To me these motions were filed out of desperation, in hopes one of the motions to get by, and to waste tax payers money because the defense has backed themselves into a corner with their "The Nanny did it" defense.
With the amount of evidence that the Prosecution has against Casey the dense is up chitts creek with out a paddle.
Now that the state have asked them to produce "Evidence" that clearly does not exists. and asked for the Defense to turn over their evidence of Caseys proclaimed innocence" . The defense turns around and claims their evidence was based on documents, pictures and video provided by the state. Well, how lazy can they get? TES said they were in the area but did not come back and completely search the area due to it being under water. That does not mean the body was not there - it just means the area was not searched. So,the Defense files a motion to dismiss the case because they cannot challenge the 33+ searchers, they will claim that since the area was not searched that it is "Possible" the body was not there put the reasonable doubt on the table. And lets not forget the famous Joy W. that claims the area was searched, that may of been their "Key" witness. LOL
However, these are not grounds to just dismiss the murder case "IMO", it just means the area could not be searched. There have been many cases where remains have been found years later in an area that was previously search and it did not mean that the body was not there originally, it just means it was missed, and that is very possible with all the foliage in that area.
The Motion To Dismiss Due To Spoliation Of Evidence has the defense saying the state failed to preserve any evidence that could clear Casey by not allowing defense experts to be present where Caylees remains were found in December while investigators were processing the area will not hold up either "IMO". The defense was out there watching and I do recall that the area was blocked off and being monitored. The only thing the state is guilty of is being competent and thorough. The experts were out there on their hands and knee's for days making sure they could recover all of Caylee's remains that were out there after being destroyed by animals, after someone threw her little body out there like trash. The state found evidence that tied back to the Anthony home and a child's skull with duct tape. So, if Casey didn't kill Caylee it would of been Cindy or George since they are the only other people that live in the home. The area was turned over to the defense around Dec 19th and after all the whining they did not bother to go out there and conduct their own investigation. The soil is and was still there and well as all the foliage and landscaping. The remains were also turned over and did they not also complete their own autopsy? They held on to the remains and later turned them over to CA and GA and then the remains were cremated, "IMO" it was done so that other further testing could not be performed, how ever that is not the states fault. That is the fault of the defense and the Anthony's. They could of sent their experts out there to see if the state missed anything and they chose not to, that is not the states fault. So, is this an open window for Casey to say her defense is negligent? She has been to many of the hearing and had her chance to stand up and tell the judge she is not happy with her defense and she has not done so. So, that opportunity is out the window.
The defense also issued a response to the states request to compel reciprocal evidence and asked that attorney visits with Casey not be videotaped. Does this not go against the Jail's rules and Regulation? Why would the judge grant a motion that goes against the jails Regulations?
I can understand that they don't record the conversations between Casey and her defense team, but the video is needed to not only protect the inmate but the staff and attorney's.Casey Anthonys attorneys say she wants to visit with her family without the meetings being recorded and those recordings being released to the media. Because all the videos have all been released in their entirety, many blogs", newspapers and radio stations have analyzed every detail of their conversations,
Her defense team argues that she needs her family support and releasing videos of their meetings could be an attempt to punish her and it hinders her trial preparation.
"IMO" the reason the defense wants the jail videos destroyed is because of the video of Casey's reaction the day the remains where found? I know the judge did not allow the media to publish it, but it could be that the prosecution is going to use it at trial and it's pretty damming "IMO".
I also feel the reason they want future video to be destroyed is because they are trying to come up with their strategy of what will be said on the stand and they need for Cindy,George, and Lee to be on the same page as Casey.
If the family is going to visit Casey to give her the support she needs and tell her the "I love you and Miss you" what is there to analyzed? There have been many murder cases where the family will go visit their family member regardless. There is nothing stopping them from going to visit Casey to tell her they love her. Nothing! Unless they want to visit for other reasons, maybe Casey wants to ditch her defense team and they fear she will ask the family to find her new representation. Regardless, as far as I know Orange County Jail has set rules for all the inmates and Casey should not be allowed to have special treatment, even though she already has said they bring her extra food and treat her so special, so how is it that she is being mistreated?
With the amount of evidence that the Prosecution has against Casey the dense is up chitts creek with out a paddle.
Now that the state have asked them to produce "Evidence" that clearly does not exists. and asked for the Defense to turn over their evidence of Caseys proclaimed innocence" . The defense turns around and claims their evidence was based on documents, pictures and video provided by the state. Well, how lazy can they get? TES said they were in the area but did not come back and completely search the area due to it being under water. That does not mean the body was not there - it just means the area was not searched. So,the Defense files a motion to dismiss the case because they cannot challenge the 33+ searchers, they will claim that since the area was not searched that it is "Possible" the body was not there put the reasonable doubt on the table. And lets not forget the famous Joy W. that claims the area was searched, that may of been their "Key" witness. LOL
However, these are not grounds to just dismiss the murder case "IMO", it just means the area could not be searched. There have been many cases where remains have been found years later in an area that was previously search and it did not mean that the body was not there originally, it just means it was missed, and that is very possible with all the foliage in that area.
The Motion To Dismiss Due To Spoliation Of Evidence has the defense saying the state failed to preserve any evidence that could clear Casey by not allowing defense experts to be present where Caylees remains were found in December while investigators were processing the area will not hold up either "IMO". The defense was out there watching and I do recall that the area was blocked off and being monitored. The only thing the state is guilty of is being competent and thorough. The experts were out there on their hands and knee's for days making sure they could recover all of Caylee's remains that were out there after being destroyed by animals, after someone threw her little body out there like trash. The state found evidence that tied back to the Anthony home and a child's skull with duct tape. So, if Casey didn't kill Caylee it would of been Cindy or George since they are the only other people that live in the home. The area was turned over to the defense around Dec 19th and after all the whining they did not bother to go out there and conduct their own investigation. The soil is and was still there and well as all the foliage and landscaping. The remains were also turned over and did they not also complete their own autopsy? They held on to the remains and later turned them over to CA and GA and then the remains were cremated, "IMO" it was done so that other further testing could not be performed, how ever that is not the states fault. That is the fault of the defense and the Anthony's. They could of sent their experts out there to see if the state missed anything and they chose not to, that is not the states fault. So, is this an open window for Casey to say her defense is negligent? She has been to many of the hearing and had her chance to stand up and tell the judge she is not happy with her defense and she has not done so. So, that opportunity is out the window.
The defense also issued a response to the states request to compel reciprocal evidence and asked that attorney visits with Casey not be videotaped. Does this not go against the Jail's rules and Regulation? Why would the judge grant a motion that goes against the jails Regulations?
I can understand that they don't record the conversations between Casey and her defense team, but the video is needed to not only protect the inmate but the staff and attorney's.Casey Anthonys attorneys say she wants to visit with her family without the meetings being recorded and those recordings being released to the media. Because all the videos have all been released in their entirety, many blogs", newspapers and radio stations have analyzed every detail of their conversations,
Her defense team argues that she needs her family support and releasing videos of their meetings could be an attempt to punish her and it hinders her trial preparation.
"IMO" the reason the defense wants the jail videos destroyed is because of the video of Casey's reaction the day the remains where found? I know the judge did not allow the media to publish it, but it could be that the prosecution is going to use it at trial and it's pretty damming "IMO".
I also feel the reason they want future video to be destroyed is because they are trying to come up with their strategy of what will be said on the stand and they need for Cindy,George, and Lee to be on the same page as Casey.
If the family is going to visit Casey to give her the support she needs and tell her the "I love you and Miss you" what is there to analyzed? There have been many murder cases where the family will go visit their family member regardless. There is nothing stopping them from going to visit Casey to tell her they love her. Nothing! Unless they want to visit for other reasons, maybe Casey wants to ditch her defense team and they fear she will ask the family to find her new representation. Regardless, as far as I know Orange County Jail has set rules for all the inmates and Casey should not be allowed to have special treatment, even though she already has said they bring her extra food and treat her so special, so how is it that she is being mistreated?