Just Jayla
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2009
- Messages
- 3,222
- Reaction score
- 210
I agree. In cases like this....you are issued a 1099.
You bet, and ABC would be sure to claim this expense on their end.
I agree. In cases like this....you are issued a 1099.
Yeah, but what consequences does Casey have to fear by not paying taxes?
How strangely convenient that Terry L. has an entire page dedicated to that topic.
http://www.deathpenaltyblog.com/the-cost-of-a-life-representing-the-indigent-accused-of-crimes-in-florida-courts-today/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yA3c3TWWMJs
(excerpt from pp. 70 71 0f rough draft of deposition given by James Hoover to John Morgan on 3/25/2009 in the civil suit by Zenaida Gonzales against Casey Anthony)
9 Q In the course of your time spent here as a
10 public citizen volunteering, did you ever come to
11 understand that ABC news had given the Anthonys or José
12 Baez money?
13 A I didn't know that to be a fact, no, sir.
14 Q Have you heard that?
15 A I heard -- I had heard that -- oh, that money
16 was given to the Anthonys, no, no, sir.
17 Q To anyone?
18 A Uhm, I had heard that money had been given to
19 the attorney for some individual -- I don't know if it
20 was given to the attorney or to Casey for some videos
21 that was on ABC news.
22 Q José Baez received money?
23 A Yes, sir, I think so. I heard that. I don't
24 know for sure.
25 Q Hearsay?
Rough Draft - 71
1 A Yes, sir.
2 Q Was it 200,000 dollars? Was that number you
3 heard?
4 A 200 or 225. I heard both numbers.
5 Q Was paid to José Baez by ABC News?
6 A Yes, sir.
7 Q And what was your understanding that that
8 money was paid for?
9 A Some videotapes that were released.
10 Q Okay.
11 A Again, hearsay.
12 Q Of course. Who told you that?
13 A Dominic Casey.
14 Q Pretty good hearsay.
________________________________________
Well if, JB is only claiming 90,000 has been paid to him, LB = 22,000 . . .
Doing the math: 225,000 - 112,000 = 113,000 left.
So Casey is not indigent.
I guess, the question is: whose name is the 112,000 in?
I'm speechless once again.
I guess LP can always donate funds.
Well if, JB is only claiming 90,000 has been paid to him, LB = 22,000 . . .
Doing the math: 225,000 - 112,000 = 113,000 left.
So Casey is not indigent.
I guess, the question is: whose name is the 112,000 in?
May be way out in left field on this statement - but...I seriously doubt one cent of the $250k was paid in taxes. Taxing would have to do with who the payment was made to and the reason for the expenditure. I seriously doubt the entire fee would have been taxed as "taxable income". For instance, if it was paid directly to JB as pymt for use of licensed products (pictures) - it would be taxed differently (if at all) wouldn't it?
I truly believe they had the entire $250k to work with (and probably more). They paid out a whole lot of money to various experts(?), attorneys, etc. Heck - just Jose & Co's traveling road show expenses to be on all the networks and do their spinning acts had to be very expensive.
I'll hush now - this quickly turned into a rant. Sorry about that!
If LP had not bonded her out in the first place, she would not have been able to supply JB with pics and videos. Therefore, JB wouldn't be in the picture at all . . . . CA would have been an indigent, CA would have a public defender, and either the trial would be finished by now, or a plea bargain in place.
In essence, LP should have stayed out of it.
JMO
IMO, the fact that LP bonded Casey out of jail did not make it easier for Casey to sell videos and photos. All Casey had to do was tell her mother or Baez, "go to my dresser or puter and there are videos and pics there that I want you to sell for me."
I do not think that CA or GA would have given JB those photos at the time. They were expecting a free ride from everyone. They also wanted KC to have another attorney so I do not think JB felt he could have gotten the pictures from them. Then there would be a chance the A's would have kept the money and controlled it so JB had no control. LOL You just know CA would have wanted an accounting of every single penny. See how fast CA grabbed that money out of KC's wallet claiming it was stolen from her. So KC out on bail provided JB with the opportunity to keep control of the money and the A's were none the wiser believing that the money came from a generous person in Connecticut. JB knew what he was doing. Look, also, at how outraged the A's were that their PR man was making money off of pictures early on. In the A's dream world KC was being supported by some powerful person who truly believed in her innocence. Busted. We now know that was never true. JMO
Not only does she have to claim proceeds from the sale of pictures and videos to the IRS, but it is also considered as income. Therefore taxable at say the 30% rate. I hope the IRS, comes after her.
I believe Casey's defense in the civil suit is being paid for by Cindy and George's homeowners' insurance carrier. Theoretically, the causes of action which might be based on unintentional negligence/negligent misrepresentation as opposed to malicious slander/intentional wrongful conduct might be covered by the homeowners' insurance policy. Thus the homeowners' insurance has a duty to defend its insured (since Casey was a legal occupant of the Anthony residence) in the civil lawsuit even if it ultimately has no duty to pay the claim/judgment.
Katprint
10+ years defending insurance claims
Always only my own opinions
Yeah, but what consequences does Casey have to fear by not paying taxes?
I saw a copy of Casey's affidavit today. She alleges Baez was paid zero for the check fraud case. What is really sketchy about the affidavit is that Casey lists herself as the "source" of the funds.
all I keep thinking at this point is, is that what 90,000.00 buys these days??? where is all this "evidence" of kc being innocent so that we can bask in the ahhha moment that jb promised & promised???????:waitasec: