Casey's Psych Evals unsealed

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
So Casey thinks she may have been date raped and that's when she got pregnant??? Yeah. Right. All I've been thinking all day is....Sorry Casey. You weren't date raped, you're just a <starts with sl and rhymes with but>!

Sorry. Been needing to get that out all day.

*post lands at random* :)

Casey Anthony deludes herself into thinking she is always a victim. She is addicted to victimhood and plays the victim card.
 
I'm trying to keep my mouth shut and not "make waves," but the bias on this thread in particular is astounding. 2 different doctors who never met Casey before (and had more of a reason if anything to side with the prosecution) said the exact same thing and had the same trouble coming up with a "diagnosis" despite Ashton's attempt to force them to have one.

I don't like how Ashton continues to laugh at the defense; that is unprofessional.

And the fact that 2 people heard Ashton call the doctor an "as&*h*(e" is also way out of line.

I don't understand why people have to be scared to post their views on this thread. Can't it be possible that George WAS involved? Can't it be possible Casey WAS molested? I, for one, think she was and she certainly does fit the profile and I've dealt with a lot of sexual abuse cases.

I have watched every single second of the trial, so you can't possibly tell me something was wrong with the jury. There just wasn't enough evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. I think the jury were probably very happy today after reading those 2 depositions by those 2 UNBIASED doctors.

Do you honestly believe FCA's story she recounted differently to the doctors? In my world the truth never changes
 
It has been awhile and I get confused, but was there a real Jeffrey Hopkins that Lee and FCA were in school with, and a made up Jeffery Michael Hopkins with the made up son Zack. Can some one help refresh my memory please and thank you.

Yes, there was a real Jeff Hopkins that Casey went to school with. Coincidently, during the 31 days between June 16, 2008 and July 15, 2008, Casey and Tony were out at a restaurant one night and Casey spotted Jeff Hopkins sitting at a booth with friends. Jeff Hopkins said that was the first time he'd seen Casey in a long time, I think since high school. She came over to the booth where he was sitting and they exchanged a few words.

I've always felt that chance meeting put Jeff Hopkins name in Casey's mind for future reference, so when it came time for her to spin a story about Zanny the nanny, she said that Jeff Hopkins introduced her to Zanny and that he had Zanny babysitting with his little boy, Zack.

Of course, as it turns out, the real Jeff Hopkins wasn't married and didn't have a little boy named Zack. That was all part of Casey's imaginary friends.
 
I agree. He is a really poor doctor at best.

I laughed out loud when he said that he was able to get Casey to talk so freely because "she obviously considered him so competent". He repeats twice how competent he is and how this helps open his subjects up.

Did you also notice how he used "I honestly think..." or "to be honest" so many times?! I was really struck by how much he uses language that seemed to compensate for his own anxiety about wanting to appear to be such a great doctor. He is anxious to boast about and impress upon everyone how competent he is and how he won Casey (this special person's) confidence so easily and then he tries to bolster his credibility over and over by repeating how "honest" his statements are.

He is not too far removed from Anthonyspeak and we all know how credible that is.

I know! Did he realize how horrible that sounded when he also said that it could be because that other woman (forgot her name) was in the room?

Of course she is just going to talk and talk and talk.... he says himself he understands that this isn't truth, she can talk all day long telling stories because as he also states he is just letting her talk at her own pace and listening non-judgementally.
 
Dr D apparently told Linda " I have no explanation for this other than she is pure evil" back in 2008 after evaluating Casey for Strickland. He conveniently cannot remember, confirm or deny this statement in 2011, after being hired for the defense.

The iorny, is indeed rich. :floorlaugh:
 
I'm trying to keep my mouth shut and not "make waves," but the bias on this thread in particular is astounding. 2 different doctors who never met Casey before (and had more of a reason if anything to side with the prosecution) said the exact same thing and had the same trouble coming up with a "diagnosis" despite Ashton's attempt to force them to have one.

I don't like how Ashton continues to laugh at the defense; that is unprofessional.

And the fact that 2 people heard Ashton call the doctor an "as&*h*(e" is also way out of line.

I don't understand why people have to be scared to post their views on this thread. Can't it be possible that George WAS involved? Can't it be possible Casey WAS molested? I, for one, think she was and she certainly does fit the profile and I've dealt with a lot of sexual abuse cases.

I have watched every single second of the trial, so you can't possibly tell me something was wrong with the jury. There just wasn't enough evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. I think the jury were probably very happy today after reading those 2 depositions by those 2 UNBIASED doctors.
Familiar with paid experts?

You must be a juror.

Did you skip where Casey left Caylee - quite often - in the sole care of none other than stay-at-home grandpa George Anthony?

Did you miss where she called him the best father/grandfather ever in the jailhouse videos?

Did you happen to see how Casey is ALWAYS claiming sexual abuse/rape..from family members to strangers at parties?

I can possibly tell you something was wrong with the jury. They spent more time analyzing the food they were going to eat and the movies they were going to watch than they did going over evidence in such a huge case that had such a mountain of evidence to be reviewed. More time was spent deliberating pizza and Harry Potter films than was the sanctity of a two year old little girl's life cut so short.
 
I'm trying to keep my mouth shut and not "make waves," but the bias on this thread in particular is astounding. 2 different doctors who never met Casey before (and had more of a reason if anything to side with the prosecution) said the exact same thing and had the same trouble coming up with a "diagnosis" despite Ashton's attempt to force them to have one.

I don't like how Ashton continues to laugh at the defense; that is unprofessional.

And the fact that 2 people heard Ashton call the doctor an "as&*h*(e" is also way out of line.

I don't understand why people have to be scared to post their views on this thread. Can't it be possible that George WAS involved? Can't it be possible Casey WAS molested? I, for one, think she was and she certainly does fit the profile and I've dealt with a lot of sexual abuse cases.

I have watched every single second of the trial, so you can't possibly tell me something was wrong with the jury. There just wasn't enough evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. I think the jury were probably very happy today after reading those 2 depositions by those 2 UNBIASED doctors.

UNBIASED doctors? They are paid guns for the defense. They are given background info chosen by the defense. The defense even gave one of the doctors a PHONY diploma to make believe she graduated.

This girl drove around with her dead child in her car trunk. She went out on a movie date within a few hours of her child's death. I was in a child abuse survivor's support group and met a whole lot of abuse victims. Most had much worse circumstances then the ones Casey describes. And none of the people I met ever wrapped their dead kids in garbage bags and threw them in a swamp, then went and partied for a month.
 
If Casey was so sure that George did something to Caylee, why was her defense at trial that Caylee drowned by accident? If I thought for one second that my father molested and killed my child there's no way in hell I'd let my lawyers put on any other kind of defense.
 
I'm trying to keep my mouth shut and not "make waves," but the bias on this thread in particular is astounding. 2 different doctors who never met Casey before (and had more of a reason if anything to side with the prosecution) said the exact same thing and had the same trouble coming up with a "diagnosis" despite Ashton's attempt to force them to have one.

I don't like how Ashton continues to laugh at the defense; that is unprofessional.

And the fact that 2 people heard Ashton call the doctor an "as&*h*(e" is also way out of line.

I don't understand why people have to be scared to post their views on this thread. Can't it be possible that George WAS involved? Can't it be possible Casey WAS molested? I, for one, think she was and she certainly does fit the profile and I've dealt with a lot of sexual abuse cases.

I have watched every single second of the trial, so you can't possibly tell me something was wrong with the jury. There just wasn't enough evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. I think the jury were probably very happy today after reading those 2 depositions by those 2 UNBIASED doctors.

You know that the defense WANTED the experts to say there was something wrong with Casey, right? :waitasec:
 
I'm trying to keep my mouth shut and not "make waves," but the bias on this thread in particular is astounding. 2 different doctors who never met Casey before (and had more of a reason if anything to side with the prosecution) said the exact same thing and had the same trouble coming up with a "diagnosis" despite Ashton's attempt to force them to have one.

I don't like how Ashton continues to laugh at the defense; that is unprofessional.

And the fact that 2 people heard Ashton call the doctor an "as&*h*(e" is also way out of line.

I don't understand why people have to be scared to post their views on this thread. Can't it be possible that George WAS involved? Can't it be possible Casey WAS molested? I, for one, think she was and she certainly does fit the profile and I've dealt with a lot of sexual abuse cases.

I have watched every single second of the trial, so you can't possibly tell me something was wrong with the jury. There just wasn't enough evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. I think the jury were probably very happy today after reading those 2 depositions by those 2 UNBIASED doctors.

You don't have to be scared to post your opinion here at all. I'm sure you are not the only one who feels the way you do!

I happen to have a different opinion than you do, but I would never attack you.

But you do know that these two doctors were hired by the defense. They are defense witnesses and they were paid by the defense for their evaluation. Have you read what Dr. W had to say?

Maybe FCA was abused (I don't believe she was abused by either GA or LA), but I doubt we will ever know for sure because FCA has lied so much in the past that nobody believes much that comes out of her mouth anymore. As a matter of fact, Casey told the first doctor who evaluated her that she was absolutely never sexually abused. Things that make you go hmmmm?

Let's say she was sexually abused. That does not give her a pass to behave the way she did after Caylee expired. She admits to seeing a dead Caylee in George's arms, yet she does nothing? She doesn't call 911? Tell her mom? Her brother? An hour later she's making date plans? Texting her boyfriend? Renting movies later that night? What about the body being in the trunk for days? George wasn't driving that car around.You can believe she didn't murder Caylee, but she is still evil behavior in my book. That's just my opinion. I know you have yours, and we just have to agree to disagree.
 
The fact that Casey allowed George to babysit Caylee has always led me to believe that Casey is lying about the molestation. A woman who has been abused wouldn't NEVER leave their child alone with the abuser.

Also, the jail tapes when Casey tells George he's the best father ever - paraphrasing there - but she tells him he is the best ever father and grandfather. No....NOT GOING TO HAPPEN. I would never tell the person who abused me that he was the best ever - even if I had to maintain a relationship with him, and I don't believe too many other victims would either. Casey is lying about the molestation.

Another telling point is when Casey was asked to choose which parent she wanted to meet with one on one at the jail. The sheriff was going to try to arrange for one of the parents to be able to meet with Casey in person at the jail - not through the video jail visits we've seen. Casey chose George. The visit never happened, even though LE picked George up at home and took him to the jail. JB, who had been out of town found out about the proposed one on one jail visit and called the jail and put a stop to it before LE arrived with George.

If George had ever molested Casey, she never would have chosen him to be the one parent she wanted to meet with.
 
Do you honestly believe FCA's story she recounted differently to the doctors? In my world the truth never changes

Yea, agree... it's simply a matter of Casey telling SOOO many different variations of what happened to every single person she encounterd that obviously something is not true. There is not a single thread of consistency in anything she has said. And records prove that. It's really not a matter of opinion, it's fact that she lied.
 
I'm trying to keep my mouth shut and not "make waves," but the bias on this thread in particular is astounding. 2 different doctors who never met Casey before (and had more of a reason if anything to side with the prosecution) said the exact same thing and had the same trouble coming up with a "diagnosis" despite Ashton's attempt to force them to have one.

I don't like how Ashton continues to laugh at the defense; that is unprofessional.

And the fact that 2 people heard Ashton call the doctor an "as&*h*(e" is also way out of line.

I don't understand why people have to be scared to post their views on this thread. Can't it be possible that George WAS involved? Can't it be possible Casey WAS molested? I, for one, think she was and she certainly does fit the profile and I've dealt with a lot of sexual abuse cases.

I have watched every single second of the trial, so you can't possibly tell me something was wrong with the jury. There just wasn't enough evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. I think the jury were probably very happy today after reading those 2 depositions by those 2 UNBIASED doctors.

I don't mind differing viewpoints

bbm
2 different doctors...but only 1 who never met Casey before

Dr Danziger had already evaluated Casey before...on July 26, 2008...he was the court appointed Dr that performed the evaluation Judge Strickland ordered...

Danziger said that he asked Casey on July 26 2008 if she was ever molested and she replied NO....he also said her "cheerful demeanour was puzzling" that for someone who's child was missing he would expect some measure of distress . She also told him in 2008 about Zanny the Nanny babysitting Caylee and had known her since 2004

http://www.cfnews13.com/article/news/2012/january/368391/Casey-Anthony-gives-details-of-pregnancy

IF Casey was ever sexually molested IMO it was not at the hands of her father, George or her brother Lee...she accused both of them...she accused Lee first and later moved onto to George.
 
Another telling point is when Casey was asked to choose which parent she wanted to meet with one on one at the jail. The sheriff was going to try to arrange for one of the parents to be able to meet with Casey in person at the jail - not through the video jail visits we've seen. Casey chose George. The visit never happened, even though LE picked George up at home and took him to the jail. JB, who had been out of town found out about the proposed one on one jail visit and called the jail and put a stop to it before LE arrived with George.

If George had ever molested Casey, she never would have chosen him to be the one parent she wanted to meet with.

Casey was given the choice to meet with Cindy, Lee or George...and as you stated...Casey chose George
 
If Casey was so sure that George did something to Caylee, why was her defense at trial that Caylee drowned by accident? If I thought for one second that my father molested and killed my child there's no way in hell I'd let my lawyers put on any other kind of defense.

They haven't got any proof GA ever molested CA, let alone Caylee. I am guessing the accidental drowning story was just easier to present in court and more believable (as much as any story of hers is believable).
 
Regarding Dr. W. stating that he backed up FCA's story with Jeffrey Hopkins. Why in the heck didn't Linda or Jeff follow it up with "You know that's an imaginary person that FCA made up, right?"

I think they probably would have waited to spring that on him during his testimony at the trial.

IMO
 
They haven't got any proof GA ever molested CA, let alone Caylee. I am guessing the accidental drowning story was just easier to present in court and more believable (as much as any story of hers is believable).

I agree that the accidental drowning story was easier to present in court..

It is a believable story since drowning is the no.1 killer of children under 5 in Florida...
BUT
they still had a big issue and that was Casey and what she did from June 16 onward until Cindy found her
The DT had to find an explanation for Casey's behaviour during the 31 days...and going after George and the family dysfunction was the way to save Casey from a Guilty verdict and the possibility of the DP
:twocents:
 
OT. I started a new job tonight..and the lady training me asked me what I thought of the Casey Anthony case..talk about a can of worms. I decided not to say much because I didn't want to make the wrong impression nor did I want to go down that road..but she told me her opinion..and she actually sided with Casey and the jury! I was shocked. I decided not to go over the evidence, thinking..clearly she must not know every single detail..and probably doesn't..

but then she explained that she'd been molested by a family member at such a young age and that she said that sort of thing changes your brain for some people..that she whole heartedly believes casey was molested and that's why she's a narcissist and can't tell the truth or recognize the truth. I just said "you know, I never thought of it that way." I still believe Casey's a liar..but it was just interesting to hear an opposing opinion from someone who genuinely felt that way and wasn't just being a troll.
You were wise to act that way. I on the other hand was also molested and only gave Casey the benefit of the doubt until I heard the opening statements, then I blew the molestation out the door/window...
Interestingly, when I had my car repaired this summer, the shuttle driver couldn't wait to discuss Casey's guilt with me!!!
 
I find the whole conversation about the last time she saw Caylee "she was in PJ's but the Body/Baby was found in shorts that didn't fit " conversation extremely telling and freaky.

Remember Casey's comment....to Rob "They are looking in the wrong place and they haven't even found her clothes."




BBM

Everyone wants to say she is mentally ill, but I think she is just an evil person. EVIL does exist in the world. CA is living proof.:twocents:

Well then how about a diagnosis of Conduct Disorder- Something!?
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
87
Guests online
145
Total visitors
232

Forum statistics

Threads
608,641
Messages
18,242,837
Members
234,401
Latest member
CRIM1959
Back
Top