Lovejac
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2008
- Messages
- 12,281
- Reaction score
- 1,655
He!! to the yeah...I'll spring for soda pops.:woohoo:
No, no, no, this viewing definitely deserves something stronger! :wink:
He!! to the yeah...I'll spring for soda pops.:woohoo:
Mojitos all around!No, no, no, this viewing definitely deserves something stronger! :wink:
Ok, maybe I am playing devil's advocate...how can you tell the difference between a "guilt" reaction and "devastated that could be my baby so close to my house" reaction? Because of the way she reacted to the first set of 'bones' that were found?
Did LP stage that entire 'find' so that her reaction could be compared for when the remains were really found?
She got medical attention after the fact because she hyper-ventilated, but they didn't bring her down there because of a condition.
(Bold mine) Either that, or they will use it to attempt to demonstrate that Casey was, indeed, distraught that her baby was found dead.A couple of weeks ago there was a thread started which touched on this topic. In that thread it was reported that a jail employee went to KC's cell for the specific purpose of telling her that remains had been found near Suburban. The poster wondered whether KC's reported reaction under those circumstances could be used against her at trial. I stated rather emphatically that it could not be, entrapment issues, violation of 6th amendment rights etc. However, if this new report is true, the circumstances surrounding her reaction are far different than the original version reported on the other thread, and the legal opinion is therefore different. I don't see any difference, from a legal perspective, between what LE did here and circumstances where LE puts an informant in the same cell as a defendant and tries to get them to talk about the crime, the latter being admissible in court. In my opinion, LE will try to introduce it at trial. The defense, however, will scream entrapment.
No, no, no, this viewing definitely deserves something stronger! :wink:
Hmm, I thought she was taken to a room and officially told about the find by JB. Such a private meeting with her lawyer wouldn't be taped. So I thought there wasn't a tape.
Now we hear this.. And most likely we will be seeing it soon.
Still not a reaction to what she has done. A reaction to being caught.FINALLY, something that wasnt a LIE from that criminal. An honest reaction to the TRUTH of what SHE had done. I doubt we will see this video, not until the trial. This is too HUGE for the Prosecution. I LOVE IT. I cant waite to see JB response to this!
Thank you Bluebelle for this news!
Still not a reaction to what she has done. A reaction to being caught.
Still not a reaction to what she has done. A reaction to being caught.
And folks- ITS ADMISSIBLE! Its a verbal act, not hearsay, not an "admission" that invokes the 5th amendment. And even with the nurse/hippa situation (which was a great question), you just can't say what she was in the nurse's office for - her verbal act of breaking down is completely admissible.
[snip]
Did LP stage that entire 'find' so that her reaction could be compared for when the remains were really found?
It's me me me me me me me me me me me ..........................Good point.
I don't think she will ever react to what she's done. Only to being thwarted in her plans to become the World's Best Evah Event Planner at Fusion.
The fact that she showed no emotion at all with the JB park finding before it was known what was found says VOLUMES!!
I'd pay to see it.