that is also what i am hoping.
i had a long talk with a senior partner in my office today - and we both agreed that it is supremely stupid of baez to let this bounty hunter circus come to fruition. the safest place for his client to be, in terms of her defense, is in jail - where she cannot talk to anyone, where no one is videotaping her every move for publicity/tv reasons, and where she isn't tempted to start running her mouth. because all roads lead to casey and no other viable lead whatsoever has been found, her only defense at this point is to keep up her silent treatment and bank on the fact that without a body, the defense can establish enough reasonable doubt to get her off.
and even without a body and any subsequent evidence, there is still enough to get a conviction for, at the very least, manslaughter. it is the prosecution's theory vs. the defense's. and right now, the defense's theory - i.e. zanny the imaginary nanny - sucks big time. so by asking a jury of her peers, "who do you believe?," it is really stupid for baez to be relying on them siding with the 22 year old high school drop out that won't even offer so much as a believable explanation why her daughter is missing, and even more so, why she didn't report her own missing child for a month.