Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think it will be the DP as it has to be even though being from the UK i don’t agree with it but i can make my peace with it knowing he won’t be put to death anyway.
He THOUGHT for second that he was getting LWOP, LMAOOOOO. Loooooooooser as he is. Did you see his fake tears for 1/2 a second?
Maybe there was one hold-out juror on this count, and since there were already 3 death penalties it was kind of moot, so they just went with LWOP.
Agree San Bernadino investigators etc. did a great job under the circumstances to get this case to Trial and conviction.I am so going to put this behind me. Although, I will never forget.
God Bless and Thank You San Bernadino Law Enforcement for picking up this mere flicker of a torch and making it into the absolute Bonfire that it really was.
I know that there are probably a dozen of you, or more, who quietly went about your business of bringing this quadruple murderer to justice.
I hope that somewhere, you are all appreciating your many years of hard work.
Most Sincerely,
Kali in So. California
It has to be something along those lines. This stuck out what the juror(s) said. Thank you @Tortoise. What could a jury do after their service to make the fight not stop here? Maybe to protect children more?
The panel did tell the defense, "we did a really good job, but it wasn't enough," he said.
"We're disappointed, but the fight doesn't stop here," he said,
Login on Twitter
Doh, that would make more sense. lol Thanks!I think that last line was stated by the defense attorney, not a juror.
Maybe there was one hold-out juror on this count, and since there were already 3 death penalties it was kind of moot, so they just went with LWOP.[/QUOTE
Dear Atty G,Richard K. De Atley (@RKDeAtley) | Twitter
Prosecutor Sean Daugherty, leaving the courthouse, was asked if jurors explained the mixed recommendations. “Not really,” he said.” They were very thorough and very thoughtful with what they did.”
Merritt defense attorney Jacob Guerard said outside court jurors also did not explain to him their reasons for splitting their recommendations.The panel did tell the defense, "we did a really good job, but it wasn't enough," he said.
"We're disappointed, but the fight doesn't stop here," he said,
Bessie, you're the greatest -JMHO, but the verdict came down as I expected. I've never believed that CM went to the the house with the intent to kill Joey. I've believeded for a long time that a violent confrontation broke out between the two men mutually and unexpectedly, as an angry exchange elevated to rage. Sadly, CM being the more ruthless opponent bested the even-tempered Joey. The noise and disruption roused the attention of Summer, who I believe was upstairs tending to the children. I can imagine Summer went after CM like a wildcat. CM became more enraged and rose to his highest defenses, killing innocent Summer in grisly, cold blood. If there's any irony here, had CM killed only Joey in the course of a confrontation, he just might have gotten off with manslaughter, or the California equivalent.
Remember, premeditation can occur within moments if accompanied by aggravating circumstances. Premeditation does not mean necessarily that Chase went to the Avo Lanehouse with the express intent to murder Joey.
In the case of Summer and the children, there was no provocation, and thus zero mitigating circumstances.
Right or wrong, that's been my view for years now, and the sentencing seals it for me. Regardless I'll sleep better knowing that at least one monster will no longer walk the streets. One down, 999,999,999 to go. I only wish my dear husband had lived to see this case through. Of all of the cases I follow, and have followed, on WS for over 12 years now, the McStay murders was the only one he inquired about frequently, and expressed sincere interest. I never saw him so disturbed and mystified about a murder. May they all rest in peace.
And now, I sit staring at my summons to appear for Jury Duty tomorrow
Are you saying everyone from the UK is against the DP ?
I’m conflicted over DP in general, primarily because someone has to do the deed & I worry for them. I have other concerns ,also , but in cases like this one ,I’m more than ok with it.
The man had every advantage a defendant could have .
I wish the UK had tougher sentences for crimes is my complaint.
Not everybody will share that that point of view of course but I do.
Are you saying everyone from the UK is against the DP ?