Your last paragraph is spot on. That fact, when it emerged, immediately struck home with me. Those two were constantly burning up their phones. And then there was total silence, the timing of which spoke volumes as to why.I've snipped your post to focus on this, because I think it highlights his victim mentality.
We've seen that same pathology, victim mentality, displayed from his arrest to his sentencing. The list of his alleged persecutors has been added to by the day -
His former [7?] attorneys
Trial counsel James McGee - ineffective
Detectives - out to get him
Prosecutors - lied about the evidence, misbehaved
Judge - biased
Jury - incapable and lynch mob
Trial counsel Raj Maline - presumably ineffective
Joseph's mother and brother - Susan Blake and Michael McStay - lied
He is an injustice collector. Summer knew the trouble he was, Joey had caught onto it when he started using MSM, and imo he hated their children by association with Summer. This was a murder that was a long time in the planning. His phone went off and he was in and back out of Fallbrook like a flash. LE did not use luminol, they didn't take the cadaver dogs inside the house, the flooring had been replaced by the time of his arrest.
One of the biggest pieces of evidence against him (aside from QuickBooks, and his phone in the desert) was him suddenly not calling Joey any more. I know the judge said in his summary that there were no voicemails from him but I think the change in call patterns deserved a mention too. It was massive to go from 20, 30 calls a day to none.
All IMO.
We don't know that the blood would have to have been left behind long enough for forensic to find it. If Summer and then kids were killed in the bathroom it could have been easily cleaned up.
And because the house was being painted and remodelled, there were tarps all over. He may have killed them on a tarp?
Your last paragraph is spot on. That fact, when it emerged, immediately struck home with me. Those two were constantly burning up their phones. And then there was total silence, the timing of which spoke volumes as to why.
It's such a shame media didn't show any interest in the trial. Prosecutors sunk the defense case, but even the trial pundits weren't following. I remember the early days of L&C presenters chatting over the QB evidence and complaining how boring it was, completely missing key evidence about the stolen deleted cheques. It seems the prosecutors now have to explain how and why they got a conviction, and defend themselves against baseless allegations by the whining losing attorney. There was so much evidence, and great prosecution strategy in the trial which moved in step with the defense, and yet it seems that because no one was paying attention the defense can get away with hoodwinking the media at sentencing.
I wonder if Two Shallow Graves will ever see the light of day, and what will be left on the cutting room floor.
HEY EVERYONE,
WE NEED YOUR HELP! IT'S FREE AND TAKES JUST A FEW SECONDS!
CLICK HERE AND SUBSCRIBE TO THE WEBSLEUTHS YOUTUBE CHANNEL!
www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TXf5vfAv8k
We are past the halfway mark. We need 1000 subscribers before we can go live with something called "Smart Chat". Using Smart Chat to broadcast live will help Websleuths continue to operate.
Right now at Websleuths youtube, we have the latest Websleuths Radio Podcast with Leigh Egan from Crimeoneline.com Leigh updates us on the Heidi Broussard case, Paighton Houston and so much more.
Click on the link and hit the "Subscribe" button and help Websleuths.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TXf5vfAv8k
Thank you,
Tricia
Yes, I wonder what will happen with the Documentary too. Especially since it didn't end up as they had hoped or expected.
I'd love to see it, because I think they had a lot of behind the scenes footage with the killer and his defense team. Wish we could see the outtakes.
In the presser after the sentencing, the media was fixated on why the DNA profiles were not run through CODIS. This will always be an issue that hasn't been satisfied by the prosecution's explanations.
I think what is important is that the defense brought this to the jury's attention before they deliberated and the jurors decided that it was not relevant to the murders. It's not new evidence, it's not hidden evidence, they had their trial and the jury resolved the conflicting evidence.In the presser after the sentencing, the media was fixated on why the DNA profiles were not run through CODIS. This will always be an issue that hasn't been satisfied by the prosecution's explanations.
This DNA that could have been deposited by anyone at any given time before the murders. Knowing the identity of the (partial) profiles does not fill in any blanks, it would be proof to murder. An accomplice possibly. 11 accomplices? Why did the defense choose to M-vac the bra cups, the cord but not the actual murder weapon? CONFIRMATION BIAS.Judge Smith shot the defence down on this point.
He who asserts must prove. This is a full murder trial conducted over many months with much expert testimony on both sides.
You can't just wander into Court after the verdict and launch into some wild speculation about how the prosecution refused to run CODIS.
You need to produce into the Court the evidence that supports your contention e.g.
what are the CODIS protocols?
did you comply with them?
what efforts did you make to get it run?
how did you go about complying with the CODIS regulations?
As Judge Smith indicated the appropriate forum would be a hearing with all the relevant experts from defence lab, FBI and prosecution. But on his feet before the Judge, Dougherty indicated that for CODIS to be run, the onus is essentially on the private lab to meet the FBIs requirements. In other words, the FBI management of CODIS is nothing to do with the prosecutors office!
McGee obviously could have requested a hearing on all this right back in the day but decided not to.
Smoke and mirrors
*That should read “wouldn’t be proof to the murderer”.This DNA that could have been deposited by anyone at any given time before the murders. Knowing the identity of the (partial) profiles does not fill in any blanks, it would be proof to murder. An accomplice possibly. 11 accomplices? Why did the defense choose to M-vac the bra cups, the cord but not the actual murder weapon? CONFIRMATION BIAS.
There is a processing and assessment period that takes awhile, about 30 days. You can research what the procedures are at San Quentin online, or one of the other forum members might know general information offhand.Where is Merritt's new San Quentin mugshot?
And he doesn't even show up as a prisoner at San Quentin?
Scott Peterson shows up. But his mugshot isn't on there.
I would delight in seeing a mugshot of Merritt in "CONDEMNED" prison clothing.