I think as in a lot of murder cases that go to Trial, the State doesn't have to prove exactly how the murders occurred, because unless the murderer confesses all those details, those details remain largely unknown. Whether CM could of had an accomplice to help, no one knows and he has never said, and all we can have are theories about the crimes he committed.I'm sort of new to this case. I can't for the life of my find where people believe the McStays were murdered? Or how Merritt was able to I presume restrain all four of them and kill them when it seemed like he used a sledge hammer. I'm guessing he could have used a gun. I watched the closing statements and the prosecutor mentioned they don't need to prove where the family was murdered for conviction but I'm wondering about theories.
Thanks for any theories offered.
If you want to know some of the theories that have been purported you might find it interesting to read back on all the threads about this case as there have been some good theories by various posters over the years.