la2cabo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2013
- Messages
- 3,190
- Reaction score
- 6,147
According to Law & Crime they'll be live streaming audio only. They have to send their equipment somewhere else so audio only.Will anyone be streaming on Tuesday?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
According to Law & Crime they'll be live streaming audio only. They have to send their equipment somewhere else so audio only.Will anyone be streaming on Tuesday?
According to Law & Crime they'll be live streaming audio only. They have to send their equipment somewhere else so audio only.Will anyone be streaming on Tuesday?
This station might actually cover it like they did yesterday:According to Law & Crime they'll be live streaming audio only. They have to send their equipment somewhere else so audio only.
Gina Watson will also be there again filming.According to Law & Crime they'll be live streaming audio only. They have to send their equipment somewhere else so audio only.
Part 3 of yesterday's hearing - James McGee
Part 3 of yesterday's hearing - James McGee
This court day was set for TWO HEARINGS.
Post Judgement Motions Hearing and Sentencing (@ 8:30am PT)
But Maline weaselled in and filed 2 extra motions 15 minutes before court began. So that threw things out of whack. And then Maline kept talking about all of these details that should have just been handed over earlier in a filed motion. Instead of being looked over before court and ruled upon earlier, the judge had to take a lot of extra time with the newest motions that had been filed that day.
Exactly. I'm sure they would have liked to have put Vlad on, just not have him subjected to cross-examination. The decision not to put him on shows the tightrope the defense was always walking, never being able to go any distance because it would be instant checkmate.@Tortoise
I find this fascinating because IMO the defence's own expert interpretation matches my own theory. CM had indeed been at the gravesite with his phone off, and then turned on his phone on the freeway travelling at high speed because he felt it was safe to do so. That is what causes him to change sites.
The obvious problem with this, is it is not exculpatory. The prosecution never said CM was at the sites with shovel in hand ringing people. But these calls place him in the neighbourhood.
So interesting to see him admit the freeway idea.
And also shows the issue with Vlad as a witness. He potentially incriminates CM
Exactly. I'm sure they would have liked to have put Vlad on, just not have him subjected to cross-examination. The decision not to put him on shows the tightrope the defense was always walking, never being able to go any distance because it would be instant checkmate.
Yep, that’s been my contention as well. It’s not absurd to believe his phone would switch towers when in travel. McGee said he felt it would be “impossible” for it to switch to another tower 6 miles away in 4 minutes. Really? Not if he’s traveling 70-80 mph which is typical on the freeway.@Tortoise
I find this fascinating because IMO the defence's own expert interpretation matches my own theory. CM had indeed been at the gravesite with his phone off, and then turned on his phone on the freeway travelling at high speed because he felt it was safe to do so. That is what causes him to change sites.
The obvious problem with this, is it is not exculpatory. The prosecution never said CM was at the sites with shovel in hand ringing people. But these calls place him in the neighbourhood.
So interesting to see him admit the freeway idea.
And also shows the issue with Vlad as a witness. He potentially incriminates CM
Yep, that’s been my contention as well. It’s not absurd to believe his phone would switch towers when in travel. McGee said he felt it would be “impossible” for it to switch to another tower 6 miles away in 4 minutes. Really? Not if he’s traveling 70-80 mph which is typical on the freeway.