Here's the FBI fact sheet link on CODIS and it answers lots of questions:
CODIS and NDIS Fact Sheet | Federal Bureau of Investigation
And according to this older article on the trial - if the DNA data/profiles were suitable for comparison to a known DNA sample - they (Bode Tech) "would have submitted the data." So I'm assuming this means if there had actually been enough data that Bode would have submitted the results to the state crime lab and then they could have submitted to CODIS. But there was not enough DNA/data.
Defense’s Showing Of DNA Evidence Tests Envelope Of Jury’s Comprehension | SBCSentinel
From Bode Tech website:
FAQs | Bode Technology
Private laboratories like Bode Cellmark do not have the ability to upload profiles to CODIS. However, we routinely provide state labs with the relevant data that enables profiles generated at Bode Technology to be uploaded to CODIS by the relevant agency.
And of course, then the defense sent items after that to Cybergenetics for their convoluted "interpretations."
Bottom line - there wasn't enough DNA or data to determine any real profiles from the McStay graves - PERIOD!
Thanks for this.
That transcript for Perlin makes clear that the Cybergenetics data was not in a format that is compatible with CODIS. It is a completely different methodology.
He indicates that some efforts were made to retrofit it. I am not sure what else he said on the topic or what Bode may have said, and frankly watching all that stuff back would make me lose the will to live.
In the end, the purpose of the Cybergenetics analysis was to exclude CM. That is the case they made.
It doesn't appear that Counsel led testimony on efforts to get the data run on CODIS, and that is really the big problem here. Counsel can't testify to this himself. He must lead evidence to support the contention of misfeasance by the State or FBI
My impression is that the defence in fact made minimal efforts because otherwise McGee could have led evidence of obstruction from his DNA experts