Also, husband number 4, may have been downloading and watching *advertiser censored*, but according to him, Christie was right there watching it with him.
Y'all, its NOT up to Christie whether to make this public or not. New York is NOT a no fault state. In order to get a divorce in New York, one must PROVE that there is a major problem in the marriage. Christie must put on witnesses to show that he was a cheater, addicted to *advertiser censored*, etc.
What I have a problem with is the judge not granting the motion to close the courtroom. It does no one any good to know these things about this couple.
I surely don't understand the Judge not closing the Courtroom.
Thanks, Jeana. That makes sense. I forget that some places don't have no-fault. I surely don't understand the Judge not closing the Courtroom.
Y'all, its NOT up to Christie whether to make this public or not. New York is NOT a no fault state. In order to get a divorce in New York, one must PROVE that there is a major problem in the marriage. Christie must put on witnesses to show that he was a cheater, addicted to *advertiser censored*, etc.
What I have a problem with is the judge not granting the motion to close the courtroom. It does no one any good to know these things about this couple.
It sucks. There was a huge article in either Elle or Vanity Fair not too long ago about a woman married to a rich guy who tried for two years to get a divorce. He ended up quitting his job and she actually had to pay her way out of the marriage by borrowing about 100K from her parents. They're trying to get New York to realize that its actually harming the same women they were trying to protect with that law, but they're apparently very slow to realize how harmful this is to all involved.
I agree, poor Alexa. However, I blame Alexa's mother for dragging her through this IN PUBLIC!
Thanks Jeana for your informative posts!
one more time: :banghead:
WHAT DOES THE BUNNY HAVE TO DO WITH CHRISTIE??:waitasec:
Especially since the Judge apparently ignored the opinion of the children's legal guardian that it would be detrimental.
Nothing! IdahoMom found a bunny and she was just being cute - posting it as a white flag!
I just hear little bits and pieces about this so I am no expert but this lady has been married 4 times! No doubt she will marry for a 5th and 6th time.
She has children with this guy and was pushing to make this divorce very public instead of handling it privately. She wants to castrate this guy in public!! Seriously!
You do not smear the father of your children for the world to see. PERIOD!
Yeah, he is a for sure! He has sexual issues for sure but I am pretty sure she knew about this prior to the marriage.
I do not feel sorry for her. She is a smart woman who has money and beauty and could do much better in her life than she has.
Pixies, as I explained before, New York is not a NO FAULT state. There has to be a trial because Christie has to convince a judge that the marriage is irritrievably broken, there was adultery, abuse and financial misdealings on his part. She had no choice but to smear the father of her children or she would have to remain married to him.
Its the JUDGE that decided that the world had the right to hear about all of this.
She is a smart and beautiful woman and I'm sure she's made her fair share of mistakes. I don't think that any of us are perfect, however, and I'd honestly hate for the world to know all of my business and sit around and talk about it for entertainment value.
Well, she's 21 now, if he was so cruel to her in her teen year's, she might welcome a chance to have some justice by having it put on record.
Didn't she fight to keep the court room open? These kids are going to be so messed up.Y'all, its NOT up to Christie whether to make this public or not. New York is NOT a no fault state. In order to get a divorce in New York, one must PROVE that there is a major problem in the marriage. Christie must put on witnesses to show that he was a cheater, addicted to *advertiser censored*, etc.
What I have a problem with is the judge not granting the motion to close the courtroom. It does no one any good to know these things about this couple.
I really feel bad for Christie. It's not like she is out trolling bars for guys. This pathetic individual was introduced to her by her best friend. He is a loser.She's on the stand now, hasn't admitted to that yet - talks about seeing it when she was in front of the computer with her son, the Post is updating the story about every half-hour. I don't think she has faced Cook's attorney yet.:
http://www.nypost.com/seven/0703200...ook_willing_to_endure_public_shame_118365.htm