oceanblueeyes
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2004
- Messages
- 26,446
- Reaction score
- 43,712
I am new to this site and I found this site because of this case. I found the article, "Faceless Victim or Hidden Accomplice?" disgusting. I feel to blame Maria Lauterbach for her rape and murder is to blame all rape victims for their rape. To blame her for her rape, murder and burning of her body and her baby and to say the Christina Laurean helped killed her our of jealousy is a put down to all women. I just cannot see how he would be such a prize. He sounds like an abuser and a real nut to me. Perhaps dps Christina was involved because she too was abused by him or she was afraid he was going to murder her too based on what she had seen. I cannot believe a woman wrote that article. Maria Lauterbach had only been out of high school for 18 months. What would she want with a married man who had raped her? She was not having an affair with him. She was afraid of him. She told her friends that, her mother that, and she filed restraining orders against him. She requested a base transfer to get away from him.
Welcome CD!
I don't understand your stance on "women."
Woman have killed because of jealousy many times over and when they have been scorned their vindictiveness and revengefulness can reek like acid. To deny that truth is wrong imo. Is it a put down to women in general because so many women seem to be neglecting/torturing/sexually exploiting and murdering their own children? I don't think it has anything to do with holding women up at all cost or putting them down. I think it is looking at the brutal truth and just because someone is born a woman never means they aren't wicked as the Devil.
The Cadet Murder case is a perfect example of the calculating, cunning, evil that a woman can partake in. She demanded her lover murder the girl that he told her he had sex with. Then we have females who are single handily wiping out their parents or participate in wiping out their entire families including their own siblings. So many women do not impress me much these days simply by being a woman.
You say she was not having an affair? How do you know that? So what if there WAS contact between them before December 14th? If that comes out will you think LE is lying?
Maria had two stories she told. One she told to her family and one she told to the Corps. They are very inconsistent. She was repeatedly asked if she felt threatened by CAL, she said "No" each time. At no time all these months was the MPO ever violated.
Since they have not charged Laurean with kidnapping Maria and it is 56 days out now, I do believe they did have contact with each other before that day and on that day and Maria came there on her own free will to see him.
Now with Christina....I think she had as much motive or more to murder Maria and Gabriel. I do not believe he could have done all the things he would have had to do in such a short time period and even if we use the bus station trip as a guide and she came right back then it would have taken her about 45 minutes just to get back and we don't even know if she went straight back as he said she came back later on. We do know that CSL was to have come in sometime around 7pm. Could be even earlier and Sutherland just rounded it off to 7. So that makes the time line so tight for it to all be undetectable when CSL walked in wanting to know where her no show hubby had been.
So she is under a cloud of suspicion as she should be. No one could be so blind to it all. I don't trust CAL or CSL and I think either one of them were perfectly capable of murdering Maria and the other one being in cahoots to cover it up. OCSD have not come out and said they have ruled her out. In fact Hudson said there could be more arrests.
I am very glad to see that a female reporter actually looks at the case from all sides including intriguing thoughts about whether the wife in this case is the accomplice or the murderer. It renews my faith that slanted biases do not come into play just because CSL is a female and so is the reporter.
imoo