LaborDayRN
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2012
- Messages
- 11,548
- Reaction score
- 52,454
Shooting could be very dangerous as well. What if the shooter missed and hit the child instead? Shooting is presented as the only safe option when it clearly isn't all that safe. And gorillas aren't normally violent (unlike chimpanzees). If those screaming people shut up for a second, Harambe wouldn't have become so agitated. A lot of his movements were protective. He took the child out of the water and into the enclosure. Nobody said he was actually trying to attack the child. If he wanted to kill the child, he had plenty of time to do it. Kid had some scrapes and a concussion (and he did fell 15 feet into the moat).
So why do you think this action was taken? Do you think they wanted to shoot Harambe? They thought it would be good press? Just for fun?
I'm not trying to be snippy, I really want to know why you think they did it.