Australia Claremont Serial Killer, 1996 - 1997, Perth, Western Australia

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bartholemeus said:
And what's with TT? Could he be any more creepy?

Does anyone know when he posted those youtube vids and other comments? Has any of it happened after Droc died?
Click to expand...

Other comments were posted around time of Jill Meagher death/Adrian Bayley trial.

Youtube vids/comments/likes are all at the times mentioned on his youtube page.
 
Itsasmallworldafter said:
Well do you think they frequently read this ?
Click to expand...
My opinion is this...
If they do, it would probably be to gauge how gullible we are. To be sure we are all falling for their BS!
So much of the information fed to us is just orchestrated crap.
TT, JM, SR, PW...all of the POI's named thus far...it's all old news and no longer relevant! But it keeps us happy...going round and round in circles..just how they want it~
 
MyLeftFoot said:
My opinion is this...
If they do, it would probably be to gauge how gullible we are. To be sure we are all falling for their BS!
So much of the information fed to us is just orchestrated crap.
TT, JM, SR, PW...all of the POI's named thus far...it's all old news and no longer relevant! But it keeps us happy...going round and round in circles..just how they want it~
Click to expand...
It's not about us.

The police BS for 3 reasons;

1. To maintain to themselves and the public that they never make mistakes and haven't made mistakes regarding this case
2. To influence the public into providing information that may lead to a break
3. To try and influence the CSK to make a mistake

They would read forums and you'd assume they'd have the IP address of every poster and lurker on the main forums on this topic. They have no special interest in keeping us running around in circles.
 
I would assume that the police monitor the different forums. There have been other threads on here where people who were involved in a crime (not necessarily the criminal) were part of the threads. There was one American thread where the person was actually caught because of what they were posting on here. I cant remember who it was- next time one of the mods are on here they might be able to remind me.

I wouldnt trust the police, necessarily, but I dont distrust them, either. To be fair, I have had little to do with the police. I just figure that the polices job is not to indulge our curiosity on a crime forum, so no, I wouldnt trust them to share all they know with us. Would I trust them with information that I had? I guess that would depend on what I knew.
 
This case , was brought up to me I had never heard of it previously , the whole concept of it is quite intriguing , the crime is so brazen , it's almost a moking of policing
 
Itsasmallworldafter said:
There must be DNA?
Click to expand...
Nope. Only chance is technology improvements in DNA in order to get the killer's DNA.

If they had DNA then a number of suspects would have been ruled out early, police would have focused on finding new suspects and testing them. Case probably would have been solved.
 
Itsasmallworldafter said:
What if the perpetrator hadn't been tested ?
Click to expand...
Why does it matter?

If police had DNA then LW, PW and SR would have been ruled out years ago as all 3 (as I understand) have provided DNA. There's no other way to interpret it. The only hope is a DNA profile of the CSK becoming available through technology advances in DNA.
 
Karl O'Callaghan told a press conference in Perth today that these new leads revolved “around DNA”.

=

We're going to bring in a DNA specialist from overseas.


Not exactly "leads". But fingers crossed they get a DNA profile. Can't criticize for trying.
 
Itsasmallworldafter said:
Interesting read , so I assume no DNA evidence exsists as they weren't cleared ? Or didn't match ?
Click to expand...

If they had DNA they would know if it's the hubby or not (unless they're doing a Caporn special on him). Body was found a week later and had been buried which further preserves forensic evidence. I think they have a reasonable chance of getting something.
 
Bartholemeus said:
It's not about us.

The police BS for 3 reasons;

1. To maintain to themselves and the public that they never make mistakes and haven't made mistakes regarding this case
2. To influence the public into providing information that may lead to a break
3. To try and influence the CSK to make a mistake

They would read forums and you'd assume they'd have the IP address of every poster and lurker on the main forums on this topic. They have no special interest in keeping us running around in circles.
Click to expand...


No, it's not about us.

It's about them and the investigation. It's about looking like they are on top of things when the public are demanding answers through the media. It's about avoiding a coronial enquiry, where every promising lead will be exposed to the public, including the killer. It's about not having enough evidence to satisfy the CP (particularly in light of the Rayney prosecution failure)

The forums are a place where the public can debate scenarios and may on the off chance, offer up some information to the task force. But the danger is, if relevant information, which they are keeping under wraps, makes it into the public domain and then the media.

So whilst we are all waffling on about long discarded suspects...yes they are happy.
If you keep the plebs happy, you keep the media out of it and they can continue their clandestine (by necessity) work.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Escambia County John Doe (1989)?

Members online

... and 149 more.
Total: 2,485 (members: 150, guests: 2,335)

Online statistics

Members online
150
Guests online
2,335
Total visitors
2,485
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
600,599
Messages
18,111,047
Members
230,992
Latest member
Clue Keeper
Back
Top