Interactions and Reactions
A guilty person gets defensive. An innocent person will often go on the offensive.
A liar is uncomfortable facing his questioner/accuser and may turn his head or body away.
A liar might unconsciously place objects (book, coffee cup, etc.) between themselves and you
A gun?
The following is MOO, and focuses more on the extraneous details vs. specifics of this case. If this is taking it too far O/T, or has been discussed in the pages I have yet to read on this thread then mods, please remove it!
The first bullet point on this list has always bothered me, frankly. Why would someone who is innocent NOT be defensive if they keep being questioned over and over? Or, perhaps, I am not clear on which behaviors constitute true defensive actions vs. offensive actions or statements when someone is being questioned about something? Or, maybe due to my past I respond differently to things than others? I personally get a little peeved when someone doesn't believe that I'm telling the truth - maybe that's a leftover trait from childhood??? I am also a little paranoid that no-one will believe me even when I
am telling the truth - that I know is an after-effect of the abuse I suffered where my father kept stressing that no-one
would ever believe me? So, how would LEOs be able to tell with someone like me when I'm telling the truth or not? I know there are other ways, but some of these things like eye-contact, body language, defensiveness vs. offensive reactions don't always apply.
Of course, maybe these things get turned on their head when you are arguing with someone who
is antisocial vs. LEOs, or psychologists, etc... The only thing I have to go on really is how my father always acted when he was accusing me of something I didn't do, and how angry that used to make me.
Also, his behavior in the courts during the family court hearings when he was charged with physical abuse of my sister, and he (partially successfully - at least for a while) convinced the judge that
I was trying to be vindictive, and he lied about so many things I had supposedly done to him, and all sorts of accusations against my character which I found out much later about when the case was transferred to a different county after they moved (a much smaller county and with a case worker who didn't buy any of my father's lies - such a wonderful woman...). [All along I think he thought that I called DCFS on him, but it wasn't me - it was my sister's friend's mother...]
Anyway, I guess what I'm trying to point out is that sociopaths (those with Anti-Social Personality Disorders) often study these things in depth and then use these commonly held beliefs to delude others into thinking they are being honest. Some are very successful in doing so, and that is why that gut feeling still separates some of the best investigators/case workers/psychologists, etc... from the rest (not that the others are inherently
bad at their jobs, just that some of these sociopaths truly are criminal geniuses, and why they can get away from prosecution for crimes LE basically
knows they are guilty of, but can't prove it beyond a reasonable doubt).
I don't think MR is one of those criminal geniuses though - he's made way too many mistakes already...
Sorry to inject my own past into this comment so much, it's just what I can bring to the discussion with my own experiences. Maybe someone can explain this to me - the defensive vs. offensive behaviors - but, maybe it wouldn't be good to do that here... I don't want to give people who may be lurking sociopaths more ammunition for their future escapades.
I'm just trying to understand a little more why these lists are always referred to as being so reliable, especially when dealing with someone who truly is likely an experienced sociopath vs. a "regular" person attempting to lie. It would seem to me that they are on totally different levels as far as response.
Also - sorry this comment was so long!
As always all of the above is from my experiences, and is MOO. :cow: