Seattle1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2013
- Messages
- 41,304
- Reaction score
- 428,903
Did anyone actually read this affidavit and pay attention to the details the CO provided? It's contradictory, she's been segregated from all as of 5/5/20 and ALWAYS shackled, so how again did she have the opportunity to go to the second floor and slip notes?
Somehow I believe nobody cares about details anymore because they are so convinced of her guilt without all evidence yet. She's a real Houdini! Imagine the tricks it would've taken to "slip out of" being shackled in a transport can to attack the driver. That's some super human ability there.
Welcome to WS @HAPPYJAPPY and thanks for your first post. Respectfully, I believe you are misinterpreting the linked APC:
More specifically, it's inmate Ms. B that is "lower level lower bunk restricted," and therefore prevented from going upstairs where LS is housed in cell #10. [pg 2/4].
Segregation from all (Seg All) means LS will not be moved around the facility with other inmates; will not be housed with anyone else; and will not have time out with anyone else.
Classified as a full restraint escape risk, LS can't be transported outside the facility without full restraints being placed on her wrists and ankles, and her wrists secured to a belt around her waist.
Clearly, LS walked around inside the facility during her time out and was able to slide notes through Ms. B's door jam. The notes match LS handwriting are locked in evidence.
You are also wrong that nobody cares about the details here -- we eat them up, spit them out, and reread them again!
https://www.courts.state.co.us/Media/Opinion_Docs/20CR3170.pdf