kittythehare
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2016
- Messages
- 18,523
- Reaction score
- 108,561
Because it describes their investigation based upon the information they received from the outset.Correct. My point is they have previously updated where he was last seen and they have not provided a revised story that includes info from this video.
That cannot be altered.
They DID qualify that it was not their statement, they stated v clearly that it was the information given to them by LS when asked in a Q&A very recently.
They started investigating a runaway based upon the information they had received.
That was their starting point.
They take no responsibility for the making of the call.
I have no doubt that obstruction of an investigation will be an ancillary charge or a superseding indictment when they finally arrest someone.
They're not going to rewrite it every time she swings a mood.
There are very strict protocols they must observe and back up with evidence and rationale for their action or inaction. The 911 call will form part of that evidence.
Imagine how many times it would have been rewritten by now if she was calling the shots!
I believe she thinks she's way smarter and she taunts them at every opportunity in a manner I've only witnessed in studies of anti gov groups.
after the presser with LS and her husband, She issued her horrible statement telling the world about all LS imperfections.
It was a taunt IMO.
Every time she tries pulling one they hit her back 1000fold and she really should try getting used to it cos this is not one she can win.