10ofRods
Verified Anthropologist
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2019
- Messages
- 15,560
- Reaction score
- 194,971
Too wild. Experts on the prosecution and defense side can’t agree on her sanity, so it’s left up to a jury. That’s crazy IMO.
Couldn't agree more. It's the same in sexual harassment and discrimination cases. It's called the "reasonable person" standard (used to be called "the reasonable man" standard) but the idea is that areas vary in their definitions of insanity (for legal purposes). It's such a can of worms. For example, there are people who believe that having a different sexual or gender orientation is a form of "insanity," (DSM disagrees - but even psychiatrists used to be divided on this, until the 1970's or thereabouts).
Was also the standard (probably still is) for *advertiser censored* cases. What was "*advertiser censored*" in Las Vegas was not the same as "*advertiser censored*" in Utah and I believe there was a SC ruling on that.
Difficult issues. Guilty but insane is the best option for cases like this one. But, if NGRI means that Tee gets 25 years in a mental hospital instead of a prison, that may be better for everyone because criminally insane hospitals are not exactly a walk in the park - there are some who get attorneys to get themselves removed to lower security prisons. We can discuss that more if she ends up in such a place - I don't think she will. I like to think I know Coloradans and that they aren't going to buy her intermittent and sudden and extremely time-limited insanity defense.
IMO.