Cindizzi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2019
- Messages
- 11,118
- Reaction score
- 151,810
Just a plane Jane like me, when I first watched it, I saw a woman controlling the extreme pain she was inflicting on herself pulling out of the cuffs.The only thing that worries me with the jury is the vid of LS aatacking the officer. She does some weird thing with her head (like leans it back) and then goes psycho. Im afraid they will think she went into one of her "alters", or had a psychotic break because she said the lady was threatening her.
We all know shes violent and sane, hopefully the jury thinks so too.
How convenient....Sounds like someone may be ill? LS?
Good one! LOLOL!!!Give her Miralax.
I cannot understand a word she says on these videos.
Yeah, she was a good softball player after all.Jurors see video of Letecia Stauch's alleged escape attempt
A video shown to the jury appeared to show Stauch manipulating her way out of handcuffs and hitting an officer in the head with a can.www.courttv.com
I can see her winding up for the attack with the Monster drink, but I think that what you saw as a weird thing with her head back is actually her winding up for a good solid strike.
BBMMorning all. This morning should be interesting I believe it's about the defendants reaction when told Gannon was found. The trial is going by so fast soon there will be justice for Gannon and his family can start the long road of healing. Jmoo
It's hard for me to make out what she's saying. Some dude claiming to be Michael the Archangel stopped them from going to church on the day of the Garden of the Gods hike.I cannot understand a word she says on these videos.
Feel blessed.I cannot understand a word she says on these videos.
Yep! Now that you and @Kiranerys have reminded me, you're totally right. I'm also a 90s teen, but I was more into Charmed
LS is at the defense table, no vomming yet.
No jury present.
Mr Tollini claims to have evidence the other lawyer visited to inform LS about the finding of Gannon's body. He's trying to put her on the stand just to say she had a Webex visit, not go into content. He's saying it won't violate attorney/client privilege.
Sounds like this will be a 'first'. If the judge allows it, and it is a new kind of thing because of how COVID changed contact between defendants and their attorneys. That prior to COVID, the visitor log would have shown the visit. That it being digital meant nobody signed the log.
Both sides arguing their case.
Judge isn't going to decide now. He's going to think it over, over the weekend. Both sides are going to talk it over together, too, and come up with a way to potentially present the evidence of the Webex visit that doesn't make it look like either side was trying to mislead the jury.
Dr Torres retaking the stand.
Jury returning.
Defense is trying to sidestep the attorney-client privilege and want only to admit there was a Webex meeting, just not the content thereof.
Sneaky.
Thankfully the Prosecution was all over that.
Jmo