Why then are we so fascinated by mental illness and crime? Well, for one, we are fascinated by the court system. Watch TV—we are inundated by courtroom shows like CSI, Law and Order, Criminal Minds. We are bombarded by information about courts, some accurate, some not. There is intense coverage on legal cases where the insanity defense was successful—John Hinckley and Andrea Yates are two famous cases. Newsworthy coverage suggests NGRI can be counted on as a highly successful defense strategy. This presumption is not correct.Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity
What does it mean to be found legally insane?www.psychologytoday.com
In fact, the insanity defense is used in only 1 percent of all criminal proceedings, and its success rate is only 25 percent of that 1 percent. Therefore, less than 1 in 400 defendants are found not guilty by reason of insanity in this country. A small sample for such intensive coverage that leads us to believe NGRI is used often as a defense. Based on current statistics, it is not and when used is rarely successful.
More at link....
I won't work for LS either. IMO
Which pub? I need to know so I don't go to that one.They're chatting like they're at the pub
In a dissociated manner, yes, apparently.Is she still talking?
I'm thinking about fashioning some earplugs of my own.
Don't squeeze my Charmin.
Well, maybe we can settle once and for all -- Eguardo v. Edjuardo.Are we actually going to see Maria & hear the fake Spanish accent?
So, she’s just a paid expert to get people diagnosed as insane?
Totally agree. But the jury has no knowledge of that visit. So all they see is him picking on him talkative old lady.Jailhouse visit was off the wall wrong! I think he was rather milder than I would be.. she's talking irrelevant nonsense for 40 minutes or longer.
Exactly.Yes, I believe that's been her primary role in life for more than a decade. Her academic publications are way in the rearview mirror (and mostly not on forensic psychiatry, head injuries OR DID). She's written some popular books, and she has made appearances, done paid lectures, collected fees from attorneys, and self-promoted.
She hasn't published in any forensic psychiatric journals that I can find for the past 20 years. Plenty of other people have, and some of them would have made better defense experts, IMO. Someone more recent and, well, less garrulous.
IMO.
Gotcha. Thanks.Totally agree. But the jury has no knowledge of that visit. So all they see is him picking on him talkative old lady.