Ghostwheel
Pyrrhonist
This makes a lot of sense, since there could not have been much, if any blood at the body site (they opened it for a memorial after less than a week, and a) I don't see any pictures of a bloody spot from the area on the internet (and we all know that would have happened by now if there had been any evidence left of where the body was located) and b) I doubt so many parents would have taken their kids there if the site was gory.I can tell you I have seen effective ways to bleed a huge hog and not spill a drop of it on any surface that was not intended to catch it and that whole set up only takes up a small amount of space and short amount of time. It would be awful to think of that being a person much less a small child but it isnt like the horror movies always and while it is terrible to think of alot of what people envision is the imagination taking hold of how you picture it to be based on what you think would happen. In reality any hunter is quite capable of not making the gory mess people think of. Not that it is the same as killing and cleaning a deer I am not saying that but the mess left depends on the person making it ,skill level and having the correct tools to accomplish their crime effectively.
Logic would then dictate that if the body were "not intact", either the body had been bled out to the extent it could, or it was actually encased in something, i.e. plastic bag, tarp, canvas. My bet is on the latter, as that would help keep DNA off of whatever transported the body.