Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Have we seen this before? I think I haven't .
http://www.courts.state.co.us/userf...l_District/Jefferson/12CR2899/arrest affi.pdf
I just read that when Austin Sigg's DNA was compared to DNA on the backpack and the victim in the park, it did not match. I wonder how that happened! Apparently Sigg thought it would be a match and decided that it was better to confess than have the police choose when to arrest him, but in reality he had been cleared as a suspect.
Whoa. Totally missed this. It flies in the face of what I thought I knew.
I just read that when Austin Sigg's DNA was compared to DNA on the backpack and the victim in the park, it did not match. I wonder how that happened! Apparently Sigg thought it would be a match and decided that it was better to confess than have the police choose when to arrest him, but in reality he had been cleared as a suspect.
What's even weirder, is, unless I'm reading it wrong, the DNA found on the backpack AND from the jogger incident *were a match* to each other. Just not AS? :waitasec: So did he somehow intentionally plant 'not-his-own-but-someone-else's DNA in both instances?
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyshtqRTc5U"]Austin Sigg Sentencing. Day 1. Part 1. Partial - YouTube[/ame]I just read that when Austin Sigg's DNA was compared to DNA on the backpack and the victim in the park, it did not match. I wonder how that happened! Apparently Sigg thought it would be a match and decided that it was better to confess than have the police choose when to arrest him, but in reality he had been cleared as a suspect.
Have we seen this before? I think I haven't .
http://www.courts.state.co.us/userf...l_District/Jefferson/12CR2899/arrest affi.pdf