This really goes to show the ridiculous victim blaming and double standards that go on in criminal proceedings. Even if PF had managed to produce one photo of KB at a liquor store, or she bought a bottle of champagne rather than sparkling cider for Thanksgiving, is that supposed to be convincing evidence that she's a raging alcoholic? Buying a bottle of wine for a holiday dinner and being seen one time a a liquor store? And even if she was a raging alcoholic, that certainly doesn't excuse someone harming her (despite KK apparently being fine with killing her for that). I mean she wasn't, but really?!
I'm probably ranting, but this defense strategy (and excusing of PF's violence by his friends) by dragging a victim through the mud for allegedly not being angelically perfect in every way really, really bothers me. Also, are we supposed to believe everybody's two least-favorite rodeo clowns (PF and KK) have never had a drink in their lives? How about CC? SF1 and clan? They're all a bunch of teetotalers, right? SUUUURE. So who freaking cares if Kelsey did?