It’s often said that SF blocked CB from seeing KB2. I think CB actually didn’t try. I think she felt it was the prudent thing to do to get a court order first. If anyone has evidence disproving this, I’ll stand corrected.I feel that PF is totally responsible for the murder, and in no way is his mom, I agree with that.
But I do not think a seemingly sweet girl like Kelsey should have been called a hooker & kicked out of a house when she was pregnant. I also don’t think poor Cheryl Berreth should have been blocked from seeing the one living remnant she had left of her murdered daughter, and I surely don’t believe CB should have been drug into a custody battle in the midst of learning her daughter had been murdered.
I by no means feel SF is responsible for Kelsey’s murder, but do I find her a distasteful person for all said actions above & for surely contributing to some of the mental torture this poor girl experienced prior to her murder-a resounding yes.
And that is the last I will mention SF.
I’m here for Kelsey, the victim in this not SF who is not a victim.
Do we know the issue is w/a prosecution witness? Is it possible DA is the one raising objections about a witness for defense?All the secrecy with this person is pretty exciting.
The defense clearly has an issue with it, and they’re fighting to either keep them out, or limit the scope of their testimony.
Hopefully judge Sells allows it!
Nah, he's a goner!
I don't think they need anymore bombshells, it's obvious to anyone with half a brain he's guilty.
Now pass some of that soup will ya, it's lunchtime and I'm starving.
Yet another hallmark of a dysfunctional family and convoluted mother-son relationship.She’s not helping the case she is obstructing.
Drove through there last year. It was pretty, but we didn't stop, you know just in case...Speaking to the references to Deliverance (Rabun County,GA, unless there’s another) it’s kiddie land compared to the cast of characters in Kelsey’s story.
While this may be true, the proper and kind thing to have done is to reach out to CB and arrange a time to get together to facilitate at least a visit. CB had done nothing to accuse PF at that time to give SF1 reason to shun CB. But those two devils knew KB "wasn't coming back" and why, hence no engaging CB.It’s often said that SF blocked CB from seeing KB2. I think CB actually didn’t try. I think she felt it was the prudent thing to do to get a court order first. If anyone has evidence disproving this, I’ll stand corrected.
Me![]()
Day 10 of the Trial.
Roll Call!
Who's Here for Kelsey?
Here, HERE!! Looking forward to the prosecution driving that final pile into PF's coffin! No "mercy rule"![]()
Day 10 of the Trial.
Roll Call!
Who's Here for Kelsey?
I agree. They were dealing with someone very dangerous. I think CB and the LE proceeded with extreme caution.It’s often said that SF blocked CB from seeing KB2. I think CB actually didn’t try. I think she felt it was the prudent thing to do to get a court order first. If anyone has evidence disproving this, I’ll stand corrected.
![]()
Day 10 of the Trial.
Roll Call!
Who's Here for Kelsey?
I thought the same, too. I do think they will take the job seriously, and see him as the guilty party. If they didn't, they would have to ignore the cellphone data and KK's testimony, which corroborated each other. Regardless of how he destroyed her remains or KK cleaned up his mess, the cellphone data just can't be ignored. Also, even if these are his peers, they probably don't want this individual running around loose, especially if they have daughters and granddaughters. He is NOT a pretty good dude!!I am up and making chicken noodle soup and catching up on the case.
I will be honest with you all. The jury pool scares me out here. These are definitely a trial of HIS peers. I’m crossing my fingers.
Can you elaborate? How is it possible to rely “too much” on something as definitive as DNA? To me that would be like saying we put too much stock in surveillance video...I do worry a bit. Some of the public seems to rely way too heavily on DNA. Gone seem to be the days people relied on non-DNA evidence...
Public perception of evidence needs to change or the perps are going to have the upper hand.
I think it would have to be with a prosecution witness. The defense hasn’t started presenting its case yet so I don’t believe the prosecution would be objecting at this point in time.Do we know the issue is w/a prosecution witness? Is it possible DA is the one raising objections about a witness for defense?