Found Deceased CO - Shanann Watts (34), Celeste"Cece" (3) and Bella (4), Frederick, 13 Aug 2018 *Arrest* #4

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hey guys sorry been busy the last few days haven't been able to comment much...However I have been looking into things and coming up with my own opinion. I'm not sure if this has been talked about I didn't see anything however this page fers busy sometimes. This is just my opinion but I feel he had lost his job prior to her returning from NC and had not told her. This may have started an argument. Just my opinion. What do y'all think?
I’m a few hours behind myself, but his company mentioning that very night/early morning (time zone s dependent), that he was fired ON the same day as the confession really tells me that they were involved somehow with LE. i.e., cameras, badge swipes on their property, etc. I doubt LE would’ve taken a break in processing him to call his employer. Total guess and HOPE on my part that there are very indisputable facts we don’t yet know. Fingers crossed.
 
No, no.

She returned from NC on August 2. If she bought the Carolina Tar Heels shirt in NC and brought it back for him, he's had it since Aug 2.

The trip she just took was from AZ. This shirt wouldnt have been in her luggage from this trip.
totally agree and realized my mistake. Thank you
 
(So, as I’ve mentioned before, one of my strengths in the past has NOT been being able to tell when people are lying (I believed Patsy R until I came here (blush), and even OJ (double blush, embarrassed). But I’m getting better as I see more and more of these types of interviews here on WS. I was thinking the other day of starting a thread of reference videos of such lying perps, “please come home safe”, “I’d never hurt my baby boy”, etc etc. Top of the thread would be CW, Mark Redwine and Emily Glass for starters...It would be interesting to compare mannerisms and verbage, etc. Man we could fill up a thread of “lying interviews in a heartbeat. I’m going to flag a mod and see if this is something they’d approve or not.)

I think that LE and likely the press, too, have learned the hard way that the very first discussion a potential perp has with them is full of valuable observations and information, possibly far more than the actual content of the speech.

Tragically, there is enough of this kind of murder that goes on that there must be a science to these discussions. However, I dont want to give any murderer any hints about behavior or speech patterns to avoid being apprehended and exposed for their crimes.
 
Hello, I've been lurking since the start of this horrific case began, and have been reading all of your ideas & theories. I thought I'd share a few of my own since we will likely be finding out more soon in the upcoming week.

1. Chapter 7 Bankruptcy wipes away all debt, with the exception of student debt. The debt is completely discharged, so the Watts would have been literally getting a financial "fresh start" after 2015. This is different than a Chapter 13, in which payments are made to settle debts, wages are garnished, etc. So, with CW's company car (his truck) and SW's Thrive Lexus, they had no car payments, no debt (with the exception of student loans), and no mortgage (see below). I think they would have been doing fine by 2016 & beyond, although I do believe her SM posts were about promotion/sales and should be taken with a grain of salt. My point is, I think this crime is less about finances than what might be initially implied when you see they declared bankruptcy 3 years ago, although I do believe the pressures of appearances (and the financial stress that entails) definitely plays into this heinous crime.

2. When declaring Chapter 7 protection, they would've had the option to include the house in the filing or not. If they did not, they could live there without making mortgage payments for years. I have seen this happen. They live there for free until the bank forecloses, which can take years. HOA dues are tied up in escrow (or a lien can be put on the house so the HOA is paid upon sale of the house); either way, the bank will have to pay the HOA any unpaid dues upon foreclosure/sale. If the Watts knew that they were forfeiting the house and the HOA dues were tied up in that, they would not pay them. They had an upcoming court date on August 24th with their HOA, so it's more than likely they were being sued for unpaid dues, which would be paid upon foreclosure (HOA probably did not know this yet).

3. I think the fact that SW and the children went to visit her family in NC for 6 weeks very strange and a huge indication here that the couple was separated. I know that she did not portray it this way on SM, but perhaps a final decision regarding their relationship status had not yet been made. I do think this was something like a trial separation, and I think this his a major factor in CW's later actions. I believe that SW returned to CO because of the aforementioned upcoming court date with her HOA. She had to appear in court in CO, and her business trip the weekend before was in AZ, both of which required her to return from NC. I believe her friend knew SW & CW were separated, and SW was planning on staying with her friend after she picked the girls up from their weekend with their dad. CW basically states that they were going to be staying with a friend in his interview. SW was probably dreading going back and confided in her friend.

4. My guess is that SW's friend was to pick here up for her OB appt and either watch the girls at the doctor's office or watch the girls at home while SW went to the doctor. That's how she knew SW missed her appointment. I think she also knew SW was supposed to collect her things and the girls and she were to come stay with her, so alarm bells went off when they "disappeared" right before doing this.

5. I think for the most part, CW was a loving husband and father. Was he as great as SW portrayed on SM? Probably not. Obviously there were problems in the marriage, though I won't assume what those problems were at this point. Anyone who could ultimately do what he did has-at the very least- a personality disorder, all the way to a full-blown sociopathic mental illness. However, I think SW had no qualms about having their children stay with him for a weekend while she went on her business trip, especially since he hadn't seen them in weeks.

6. I don't think he planned it days in advance, but I do think he had the intent to murder his family before he began the act. To me, even if he isn't the most intelligent of men, certain details would have been planned better had he thought about it a bit more. I think he was stewing while she was on her business trip, thinking, "You've had my girls away from me for over a month, I need them here with me, I can't let you do this to me again." He mentions this feeling in his interviews in a roundabout way, stating that he couldn't stand to be alone in the house, he "needed" to have the girls there with him, telling them to eat their dinner, watching TV snuggled up on their couches, etc. It's interesting when you think that he's been alone without those things for weeks and weeks. It's not like that night he's referencing was the first time he'd been without them in days. So he's telling us, I could't bare that. In his mind, this crime was about love. He loved them too much to lose them again. F-d up, I know. It's hard to comprehend why someone would murder their own innocent children. But: they were about to be foreclosed on (my assumption), she was planning on leaving and taking their children (perhaps permanently, but at least for a while as she'd already been gone 6 weeks and was planning to go to a friend's that day), and (in his mind), he was going to lose everything because of her. So, he had to keep that from happening, in one fatal act of control. He loved them too much to lose them again.

7. I tend to think he killed the girls first, then killed his wife. I think he was having this emotional reckoning while she was away on her trip, and killed the girls to keep them from being taken away by SW upon her return. I think their "emotional conversation" was him wanting her to know that she'd lost--not him. He let her know what he'd done, then killed her.
His intent was to put all 3 bodies in the oil wells, which he was extremely familiar with. His job was to check those wells as an operator for Anadarko. More than likely, he knew what ones would be best/most obscure/less used. I think he had no trouble lifting his babies up into the tanks, and he had thought he could get Shannon in as well. At the last minute he realized her dead weight was much harder to hoist up and in than he had thought, so he panicked and quickly buried her in a shallow grave nearby with the intention of getting her into a well when better prepared/more time.
I definitely think he panicked and acted hastily, at least with SW's murder. I think he expected her to return at 11 PM, but she did not come home until 3 hours later. They had a confrontation, she put up a fight (as evidenced by his scratches/bites), and he was left with very little time to dispose of the body/bodies. Add to that her friend showing up at lunchtime, and like many of you have surmised, he had no time to return home and "set the scene."

Like many of you, the most disturbing thing to me about this crime is how such a seemingly normal man could commit such horrendous crimes, and show zero emotion about what he had done.
 
Yeah, she didn't think he "had game". :(
Hmmmmmm...again curious about sexual dysfunction, and how that might or might not have contributed to his mindset in anyway...

Again, I realllly wonder, if they were boys would he have killed them?

Thought, are the genders of FA victims more male, female, or evenly split?
 
I just had an awful thought, you know how there seems to be an increase in mass shooters? What if there becomes in increase in FAs? (Getting carried away in my head lol) . But seriously, I’m interested in the psychology of all this.
 
Someone also mentioned he was not wearing his purple lupus bracelet (apparently he NEVER took it off). I imagine it was one of those rubber ones and possibly Shanann ripped it off during a struggle.

When I couldn’t sleep last night, having probably seen the same post you did, I went through her entire IG. If memory serves me correctly now, the last it is in photos was May 2018. Again, memory.... but it was this year and either May or at the very last March. That was IG, as we all know FB has already turned into a remembering account.
If this poster was onto something and that played into, I’m hoping (soooo hard to type this but), I’m hoping whatever material it’s made of would show under fingernails. :*(
 
This morning I woke up early (4am) due to insomnia. I found myself thinking about this case. I tried to picture CW in his jail cell this morning. I wonder if he actually slept through the night or if he just lied there staring at the ceiling. He appeared, IMO, defiant and angry in his mugshot and when he was in court. I am sure he is completely pissed off that he got caught, and so quickly as well.

Just a couple of days ago, he had a job, he had a house, a car, comfortable clothes, good food, a life. (I didn't mention family because that was the one thing he wanted to get rid of). Now he is in a small cement room with a metal toilet. All his plans failed. He didn't get the freedom he imagined he would get after getting rid of his wife and kids.


all of which might be true if it was planned
 
Yes, I have known of that before. I have never been afraid of my husband or detected any kind of cruelty in his nature, so have never had to deal with anything like that. I have known of women- numerous times- who were threatened or even physically attacked by their husbands- but thought that it was just something between them and never feared for their children's safety. All these times I know of- the children were never harmed by the spouse/ex-spouse as time went on.

In my state domestic violence against a spouse is considered child abuse. Children can be taken by the state if they witness abuse and the victim insists on staying with an abuser after the police have become involved, for example.

That is in PART because those who abuse spouses have a greater likelihood of being violent with their children.
 
No problem. My errors are legion here. It's a sign of obsession how much I keep researching on this murder.
Even though it's still interesting to watch how he replies. If it was me, what a wacky thing to ask when my family has vanished. His response is soooo off
 
I am so impressed by your openness and your insight into this kind of financial quagmire. I can tell you are so much stronger for your struggle.
It was a low point in my life. I think the lowest. I do know these struggles can really build resentments and affect your life to the extreme...so I would never underestimate their impact on anyone. I had to slay some demons and learn to establish boundaries as a result of this... so yes I am definitely stronger because of it. Thank you for your comment :)
 
Sorry if this has already been said, but I’m an attorney and I think if I were his defense attorney I’d definitely try to blame Thrive. It’d be interesting to see how Thrive defends itself. Their easiest defense would be that there is absolutely no pharmacological benefit to Thrive and thus, no way the patch would cause someone to snap and kill a person. But doing that would ruin their business. So they would have to come up with another defense, one that would be a lot more complicated.
THIS! Except I was thinking from the other side. That I hope the Prosection is smart enough to get stats from Thrive/Level (sp) to be fully prepared for this! I.e., out of 1.9 million users (totally made up number), only ONE has murdered their family.

I also noticed that whatever the defense team brought from the house were mostly in CLEAR storage containers. While I did enlarge to see better, I’m not a rep of Thrive so couldn’t tell if products were in there. Anyone else zoom in to see? And, WHY carry out in clear containers? Why not brown paper bags or cardboard boxes if you are trying to keep defense angles a secret.
 
ty!

"her people" certainly seems like there are two seperate lives going on

vs

i called all our friends

he just did it again

i will staying my friends

not our friends

its strange -- his fingernails are bugging me!

there spotless! i just would think dragging bodies wrapping bodies climbing up oil wells digging graves killing people

sounds crazy i know

this time he says he saw her really quick -- is different than the emotional conversation

she was the pants of the family -- she usually gets my clothes ...!
sounds to me like someone who pooh-,looks idea of nut allergy and is testing it out. How horrible
 
Hello, I've been lurking since the start of this horrific case began, and have been reading all of your ideas & theories. I thought I'd share a few of my own since we will likely be finding out more soon in the upcoming

3. I think the fact that SW and the children went to visit her family in NC for 6 weeks very strange and a huge indication here that the couple was separated. I know that she did not portray it this way on SM, but perhaps a final decision regarding their relationship status had not yet been made. I do think this was something like a trial separation, and I think this his a major factor in CW's later actions. I believe that SW returned to CO because of the aforementioned upcoming court date with her HOA. She had to appear in court in CO, and her business trip the weekend before was in AZ, both of which required her to return from NC. I believe her friend knew SW & CW were separated, and SW was planning on staying with her friend after she picked the girls up from their weekend with their dad. CW basically states that they were going to be staying with a friend in his interview. SW was probably dreading going back and confided in her friend.

4. My guess is that SW's friend was to pick here up for her OB appt and either watch the girls at the doctor's office or watch the girls at home while SW went to the doctor. That's how she knew SW missed her appointment. I think she also knew SW was supposed to collect her things and the girls and she were to come stay with her, so alarm bells went off when they "disappeared" right before doing this.

5. I think for the most part, CW was a loving husband and father. Was he as great as SW portrayed on SM? Probably not. Obviously there were problems in the marriage, though I won't assume what those problems were at this point. Anyone who could ultimately do what he did has-at the very least- a personality disorder, all the way to a full-blown sociopathic mental illness. However, I think SW had no qualms about having their children stay with him for a weekend while she went on her business trip, especially since he hadn't seen them in weeks.

6. I don't think he planned it days in advance, but I do think he had the intent to murder his family before he began the act. To me, even if he isn't the most intelligent of men, certain details would have been planned better had he thought about it a bit more. I think he was stewing while she was on her business trip, thinking, "You've had my girls away from me for over a month, I need them here with me, I can't let you do this to me again." He mentions this feeling in his interviews in a roundabout way, stating that he couldn't stand to be alone in the house, he "needed" to have the girls there with him, telling them to eat their dinner, watching TV snuggled up on their couches, etc. It's interesting when you think that he's been alone without those things for weeks and weeks. It's not like that night he's referencing was the first time he'd been without them in days. So he's telling us, I could't bare that. In his mind, this crime was about love. He loved them too much to lose them again. F-d up, I know. It's hard to comprehend why someone would murder their own innocent children. But: they were about to be foreclosed on (my assumption), she was planning on leaving and taking their children (perhaps permanently, but at least for a while as she'd already been gone 6 weeks and was planning to go to a friend's that day), and (in his mind), he was going to lose everything because of her. So, he had to keep that from happening, in one fatal act of control. He loved them too much to lose them again.

7. I tend to think he killed the girls first, then killed his wife. I think he was having this emotional reckoning while she was away on her trip, and killed the girls to keep them from being taken away by SW upon her return. I think their "emotional conversation" was him wanting her to know that she'd lost--not him. He let her know what he'd done, then killed her.
His intent was to put all 3 bodies in the oil wells, which he was extremely familiar with. His job was to check those wells as an operator for Anadarko. More than likely, he knew what ones would be best/most obscure/less used. I think he had no trouble lifting his babies up into the tanks, and he had thought he could get Shannon in as well. At the last minute he realized her dead weight was much harder to hoist up and in than he had thought, so he panicked and quickly buried her in a shallow grave nearby with the intention of getting her into a well when better prepared/more time.
I definitely think he panicked and acted hastily, at least with SW's murder. I think he expected her to return at 11 PM, but she did not come home until 3 hours later. They had a confrontation, she put up a fight (as evidenced by his scratches/bites), and he was left with very little time to dispose of the body/bodies. Add to that her friend showing up at lunchtime, and like many of you have surmised, he had no time to return home and "set the scene."

Like many of you, the most disturbing thing to me about this crime is how such a seemingly normal man could commit such horrendous crimes, and show zero emotion about what he had done.

Interesting post. They would have gotten notice of pending foreclosure and that would have been public record, right?

I’m not sure if the six week separation meant they were separated. I have seen copies do similar things because it’s easier to ignore problems and hope they go away, than try harder to work it out. I currently work with a married couple that lives in two different cities (“because of work”). That’s terrible for a marriage, especially when there’s kids involved. But at the end of the day, I believe plenty of couples think it might help instead of hurt, or at least allow them to avoid working on it together.
 
So I’m reading up as much a I can on “family annhilators”; as I said I know a lot about SKs, mass shooters, pedophiles, etc, but know nothing about this classification of killer.

I’m posting any articles as I come across them for anyone who is interested.

(O/T:
Pike County massacre: Some killers are 'family annihilators,' former FBI agent says

“Well there's a term called 'family annihilators,' and this may well fit that profile," former FBI agent Brad Garrett said.

"It's not uncommon for a shooter like this to go from one house to another house to kill everyone that he thinks has harmed him in some form or fashion," he said.

The individual is typically a white male, Garrett said. And in rural areas, like Pike County, family has deep importantance. The killer, he said, may "decide for a number of reasons -- primarily financial and primarily loss of control of the family -- decide they're going to kill everyone. And many times -- most of the time -- kills themselves."“)

-So thinking about the above further, I wonder just how rare it is statistically that this “family annihilator” did not kill himself (yet).

———-
Another link, hmmmmmmm:

“No one knows for sure why Bishop apparently killed his family, other than the obvious — to get rid of them and start a new life. Such killers are known as Family Annihilators.“
‘Family Annihilator’ evades justice for 42 years - Rocky Mount Telegram

(Thinking out loud, do these “FAs” (tired of typing it out everytime), ever cross over into other categories?)

I thought it would be interesting to compile a chart with all the ones we know - a table with their demographics, month they killed, whether they killed or tried to kill themselves, whether the confessed, ages of the kids and things like whether they were having an affair, did they have debt, a secret, whether the spouse had tried to leave, and also whether they had a mental health diagnosis.

There are female family annihilators too and they could be included.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
88
Guests online
1,419
Total visitors
1,507

Forum statistics

Threads
605,841
Messages
18,193,409
Members
233,592
Latest member
KaylaSolves
Back
Top