Agreed.
^^bbm
That is my guess as well. If that fuse is pulled, I don't think the GPS would work, period. Also, I don't think any SYNC data would be sent. What I am wondering about is if this would cause a power removal event. Seems unlikely to me. Why would one design a system that cuts power if the GPS and SYNC don't work?
To be clear, the new owner of PP was granted a permanent restraining order, and SD's former neighbor from the apartment complex that went to court recently was not granted any order.
Looks like Judge Lama and Judge Wemmer have past practices in criminal law, but it doesn't look extensive and they've only served five or six years as judges. In a small district all four judges handle every kind of case, but I can't see Judge M handing off a complex First Degree Murder case to any of the other three.
Narcissists believe they own people. That’s how he treated Suzanne. I was creeped out when I saw he had taken one of his “possessions” on a hunting trip alone, without other family present.
Thanks for catching my mistake. I definitely meant DN !If referring to the woman in grey suit, that's DN, not IE.
Interesting. A person in the legal field in Colorado also mentioned to me last night that in their opinion there weren't any available judges in the district with the experience of Judge Murphy. I hope he does NOT recuse himself.
And because the defense are two, very, very, smart lawyers, they waited for Judge Murphy to recuse himself in a separate matter, and pounced, -- using his own actions in support of their motion!
I think they had to wait for Judge Murphy to disqualify himself from Shoshona's trespass trial, which occurred October 13. So yeah, they waited ~2 months to make this motion.
Exactly. His recorded interviews with Grusing and other investigators will be bad enough, and putting Barry on the stand would only exacerbate that.
Again, this smart team waited to file the motion until late afternoon Monday (after 3 pm)-- the day before BM's hearing! Had they filed their motion last week, the court probably would have continued Tuesday's hearing but this way they ensured they would be providing more drama for media attention when the hearing was cut short. For example, we're still talking about it!
I think the conflict came when the discovery arrived for the trespassing case and it was apparent that all together prosecution had compiled quite the dossier on SD. I'm curious if in fact this really just came out on Thursday, because some of the original warrants and LE legwork should have been disclosed to defense long ago and not just "Thursday" something doesn't feel right because yes, these are smart ladies with strong teams.... but there has been alot of messy info in this case since day one practically. If it's late disclosure it just gets added to the laundry list of alleged oopsies by prosecution.
No legal ethics would preclude them from discussing SD's trespass case, plus he's not SD's lawyer someone else in the firm is so ethics at the firm would preclude discussion with her husband in my opinion. I admit it's getting muddier by the minute but I don't think there is a conflict between the two cases. The only common denominator was the judge presiding over the trespass case and now the murder case if SD is a primary witness as is alleged because the conflict of the judge if her lawyer is in court advising her through the murder trial.
