This was poorly stated. Sorry about that.
What I meant to say is that the 'partial DNA' found in the glove box was a familial DNA of someone who committed the sexual crimes in other states - meaning that someone related to the person who committed those crimes left their DNA in the glove box.
That a layman can be led to believe, and that a nationally televised supposed news program would be so remiss to not only not explain what 'partial dna' means, but to allude that another person may may be responsible for Suzanne's disappearance/murder is unconscionable.
The defense had a field day with that bull. The prosecution had better have an expert to squash those blatant lies.
It's quite likely they won't be allowed to make those arguments in front of the jury.
They succeeded in getting their lies on TV which is often the point.