Seattle1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2013
- Messages
- 40,429
- Reaction score
- 421,915
What rubbish and the defense knows it!That is the issue. Prosecution should have turned over the DNA testing results, how they followed through and how they determined those partial matches were connected to people who could not be involved or be honest about any unknown partial matches. I don’t understand why it was obscured to begin with unless there was concern that they wouldn’t get past probable cause. It seems like if prosecution would have been forthright it would have been addressed during the preliminary and we wouldn’t be here 3 years later talking about DNA. Maybe that is a naive view but sure seems straightforward to me.
The affidavit was prepared /signed May 2021 and the PH concluded end of August 2021 yet they are citing results dated Nov 2021! I'm sure the defense is using the very discovery received from the State to misrepresent claims (aka "IE's version") cited in the Civil Suit.