Found Deceased CO - Suzanne Morphew, 49, Chaffee Co, 10 May 2020 *Case dismissed w/o prejudice* *found in 2023* #113

Status
Not open for further replies.
I was searching this morning for info on what color BAM is. I recall a reddish smear on the wall in the house they swabbed and it was not blood. I was curious if BAM might be reddish in color.. I didn't find any info on what color is is though.. but I did find a research study done that was interesting.


Check this out! It's about BAM use in Bison. It has some slides that just list out a few key points and one of them is:
3 required additional top up doses (hand injected)

It also seems of the 3 drugs in the combo the first 2 are used on humans for various things, but the third one medetomidine is the key ingredient that needs reversed and seems not to be used in humans.

So it seems that even when darting large wild animals it is often necessary to top them up by hand injecting more BAM.
Wow, thanks for finding that. So sad to think that brute may have sat atop Suzanne and. BAM'd her, I bet that may have been when he got those deep fingernail gouges. :(
 
We have the BAM information but, nothing beyond that. There is a treasure trove in the soil and insects surrounding SM.

They, I'm sure, are in the process of studying the insects. With that they actually can determine elapsed time since death.

Insect evidence can also show if the body has been moved to a second site after death, or if the body has been disturbed at some time. Meaning animals. Or it can mean the murderer returning to the scene of the crime (which I don't think BM did).

Also they will be pouring over the soil. I thought it was interesting that the soil around people who’d been treated for cancer showed less microbial species  richness, for example, perhaps because the chemotherapeutic agents inhibited the growth of microbes. Even tho that could be the case with SM, the soil will tell her story.

We have yet to see all these magnificent findings.


 
We have the BAM information but, nothing beyond that. There is a treasure trove in the soil and insects surrounding SM.

They, I'm sure, are in the process of studying the insects. With that they actually can determine elapsed time since death.

Insect evidence can also show if the body has been moved to a second site after death, or if the body has been disturbed at some time. Meaning animals. Or it can mean the murderer returning to the scene of the crime (which I don't think BM did).

Also they will be pouring over the soil. I thought it was interesting that the soil around people who’d been treated for cancer showed less microbial species  richness, for example, perhaps because the chemotherapeutic agents inhibited the growth of microbes. Even tho that could be the case with SM, the soil will tell her story.

We have yet to see all these magnificent findings.


I still find it crazy ironic it was BAM, considering you being so well known for your BAM!'s here.
I mean, what are the odds? :oops:
 
Barry and the Chipmunks

The limited data in the Autopsy Report suggests a certain connection between the burial site conditions and Mr. Morphew, albeit not a direct one. There are numerous studies in the technical literature regarding the forensic implications of animals scavenging on human remains. Though chipmunks will feed on carrion, it is widely noted that rodents (i.e. chipmunks) are attracted to dry bone for mineral intake or incisor shortening (their teeth grow continuously and need to be ground down), even if they are herbivorous.

There are several small mammals which are very numerous in the San Luis Valley near Moffat. These include the Least Chipmunk (Eutamias minimus caryi) and the Ord Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys ordi). The Least Chipmunk is considered as being endemic to the San Luis Valley of Colorado and is quite abundant in the rabbit brush of the valley floor (i.e. the burial site). It is also found sharing the same habitats with the Colorado Chipmunk at higher elevations (i.e. Puma Path).

I took the picture below at the burial site in January and a burrow typical of a chipmunk (which is actually a ground squirrel) can be seen along with a lot of rabbit brush (yellowish shrubs in background).
1714839922666.png
From this information I’m thinking that chipmunks were among the animal scavengers at Suzanne’s burial site, and the ones most likely to scatter and transport the smaller bones away from the initial deposition site. This is done usually to bring them to their offspring in the burrow and/or to feed in a more protected environment.

The Autopsy Report noted that three large bags contained collected bones; two of these from day 1 of the site evaluation and the other from days 2 and 3. This might imply that the third bag contains bones found dispersed around the main burial location found as the search widened.

To the extent that the scattering of the bones may have been a significant factor in the discovery of the burial site (which I’m thinking it was), the humble chipmunk, yes, Mr. Morphew’s arch nemesis, may have played an important role in bringing him to justice (not just for Suzanne’s murder but also for the decimation of their kind around the Puma Path home).

I am not prepared to comment on whether this is merely a cosmic coincidence or some form of interspecies payback.
 
.

It is only being discussed since Barry's lawyers have tried to use it to say Barry is innocent because the caffeine was from the cup of coffee Suzanne had on Sunday morning.

Agree, but it seems like such a modest and easily dismissible point. Why couldn't it be from the cup she had Saturday? Or a cup Barry tucked into her BAM-unconscious hands?

This just seems like another Iris McGuffin hastily constructed and widely broadcast in an effort to make it into something it isn't -- convincing exculpatory evidence.

"If the coffee's sipped -- you must acquit!"

Well, not exactly.
 
Barry and the Chipmunks

The limited data in the Autopsy Report suggests a certain connection between the burial site conditions and Mr. Morphew, albeit not a direct one. There are numerous studies in the technical literature regarding the forensic implications of animals scavenging on human remains. Though chipmunks will feed on carrion, it is widely noted that rodents (i.e. chipmunks) are attracted to dry bone for mineral intake or incisor shortening (their teeth grow continuously and need to be ground down), even if they are herbivorous.

There are several small mammals which are very numerous in the San Luis Valley near Moffat. These include the Least Chipmunk (Eutamias minimus caryi) and the Ord Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys ordi). The Least Chipmunk is considered as being endemic to the San Luis Valley of Colorado and is quite abundant in the rabbit brush of the valley floor (i.e. the burial site). It is also found sharing the same habitats with the Colorado Chipmunk at higher elevations (i.e. Puma Path).

I took the picture below at the burial site in January and a burrow typical of a chipmunk (which is actually a ground squirrel) can be seen along with a lot of rabbit brush (yellowish shrubs in background).
View attachment 501356
From this information I’m thinking that chipmunks were among the animal scavengers at Suzanne’s burial site, and the ones most likely to scatter and transport the smaller bones away from the initial deposition site. This is done usually to bring them to their offspring in the burrow and/or to feed in a more protected environment.

The Autopsy Report noted that three large bags contained collected bones; two of these from day 1 of the site evaluation and the other from days 2 and 3. This might imply that the third bag contains bones found dispersed around the main burial location found as the search widened.

To the extent that the scattering of the bones may have been a significant factor in the discovery of the burial site (which I’m thinking it was), the humble chipmunk, yes, Mr. Morphew’s arch nemesis, may have played an important role in bringing him to justice (not just for Suzanne’s murder but also for the decimation of their kind around the Puma Path home).

I am not prepared to comment on whether this is merely a cosmic coincidence or some form of interspecies payback.

What would we pay to see Barry in cuffs escorted by an Honour Guard of Least Chipmunks, bearing testimony for Suzanne and the 39* or whatever of their number slain by Barry (allegedly) with a .22!

* As with all of Barry's numerical claims, viz., the 400 tours of duty by his firefighting chum, divide the stated number by 100, or subtract all but one, whichever produces the lower number.)
 
BM alleges he was deprived of his civil right under the US Constitution and the Colorado State Constitution, and in a Civil Suit filed last May, seeks $15M in damages, and the return of his seized property.

While BM's Complaint at more than 180 pages raised a multitude of grievances about how the investigation into SM's disappearance unfolded, IMO, the core of the Complaint is that the Arrest Affidavit was false and misleading.

Following BM's allegations, each of the defendants responded to the Complaint with Motions to Dismiss-- requesting the Court dismiss BM's
§1983 claims for failing to to state any plausible claims for constitutional violations, and that the defendants are entitled to qualified immunity.

In addition, several defendants also challenged the state-law claims because they are not “peace officer” under Colo. §13-21-131(1).

While the Court granted BM an extension to respond to the defendants Motions to Dismiss, and he's still working on them, as of today, BM has voluntarily dismissed his claims against the FBI Agents (Grusing and Harris), and Chaffee County Sheriff's Sergeant Hysjulien.

I'm not certain of the understanding here about BM Civil Suit. For clarification purposes, please find the the 13 claims he's made in support of his money grab:

V. STATEMENT OF CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

CLAIM ONE:
42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Bivens16 Malicious Prosecution and unlawful detention

Defendant Officers, Defendant Prosecutors, Defendant FBI Agents, and Defendants Cahill, Duge, Rogers, Graham, Koback, and Lewis

CLAIM TWO: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Due Process and Bivens– Fabrication of Evidence

Defendants Walker, Cahill, Graham, Rohrich Defendant Prosecutors, Defendant FBI Agents

CLAIM THREE: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Due Process and Bivens– Franks Claim

Defendants who authored the Arrest Affidavit Defendant Walker, Defendant Prosecutors Stanley and Lindsey, Defendant CBI Agent Cahill, Defendant Officers Rohrich, Spezze, and Graham, Defendant FBI Agents Grusing and Harris

CLAIM FOUR: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Bivens– Conspiracy

All Defendants

CLAIM FIVE: 42 U.S.C. § 1983– Due Process – Unlawful retention of property

Defendants Spezze, Stanley, Hurlbert, and the CCSD

CLAIM SIX: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Bivens– Failure to Intervene

All Defendants

CLAIM SEVEN: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Bivens– Reckless Investigation –

Defendants CCSD, Defendant Officers, Defendant CBI Agents Cahill, Duge, Rogers, Graham, Koback, Defendant FBI Agents, and Defendant Prosecutors

CLAIM EIGHT: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 – Monell- Final Policymakers, Ratification, Unconstitutional Official Policy and Failure to Supervise and Train

Against Chaffee County, Board of County Commissioners of Chaffee County, CCSD, Defendant Stanley acting in her official capacity, and Defendant Spezze acting in his official capacity

STATE LAW CLAIMS

CLAIM NINE: Malicious Prosecution (state law)Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-21-131 – Violation of Colo. Const. Art. II, Section 7 (Unlawful Seizure), Section 25 (due process), Section 3 (inalienable rights).

Defendant Officers, Defendant Prosecutors, and Defendants Cahill, Duge, Rogers, Graham, Koback, and Lewis

CLAIM TEN: Fabrication of Evidence Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-21-131 – Violation of Colo. Const. Art. II, Section 7 (Unlawful Seizure), Section 25 (due process), Section 3 (inalienable rights)

Defendants Officers, CBI Agents and Defendant Prosecutors

CLAIM ELEVEN: False and Misleading Information in an Arrest Warrant Affidavit and Omission and Concealment of Exculpatory Information (state law)

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-21-131 – Violation of Colo. Const. Art. II, Section 7 (Unlawful Seizure), Section 25 (due process), Section 3 (inalienable rights)

Defendant Walker, Defendant Prosecutors Stanley and Lindsey, Defendant CBI Agent Cahill, Defendant Officers Rohrich, Spezze, and Graham

CLAIM TWELVE: Conspiracy (state law) Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-21-131 – Violation of Colo. Const. Art. II, Section 7 (Unlawful Seizure), Section 25 (due process), Section 3 (inalienable rights)

Defendants CCSD, Defendant Officers, Defendant CBI Agents, Defendant Prosecutors

CLAIM THIRTEEN: Unlawful deprivation of property (state law) Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-21-131 – Violation of Colo. Const. Art. II, Section 7 (Unlawful Seizure), Section 25 (due process), Section 3 (inalienable rights)

Defendants Spezze, Stanley, Hurlbert, and the CCSD

VI. REQUEST FOR RELIEF

A. Compensatory and punitive damages, including damages for emotional distress, humiliation, loss of enjoyment of life, loss of future business earnings, and other pain and suffering on all claims allowed by law in the amounts detailed below or such greater amount as may be set by a jury;

B. Economic losses on all claims allowed by law in the amounts detailed below or such greater amount as may be set by a jury;

C. Special damages and/or injunctive relief, including but not limited to, requiring that the Chaffee County Sheriff’s Department have required training and oversight of the Sheriff and the Deputies and other personnel so as to prevent similar decisions being made in the future that results in the violations of individuals’ constitutional rights and conspiracies to do so;

D. Special damages and/or injunctive relief, including but not limited to, requiring that the Chaffee County Sheriff’s Department have required training and oversight of the Sheriff and the Deputies and other personnel so as to prevent similar decisions being made in the future that results in the violations of individuals’ constitutional rights and conspiracies to do so;

E. An order that CCSD, Chaffee County, EJDAO, and any other Defendant holding his property release his property to him forthwith;

F. Pre- and post-judgment interest at the lawful rate; and

G. Damages to date are estimated to be Fifteen Million ($15,000,000) to include all categories listed above.

H. Attorneys’ fees and the costs associated with this action, including expert witness fees, on all claims allowed by law;

I. Any further relief that this court deems just and proper, and any other appropriate relief at law and equity.


ETA: remove strikes
 
Last edited:
Why is the caffeine even remarkable? I don't understand at all. One doesn't die from caffeine.
Because IE is trying to nail it to the timeline- Barry is innocent because Suzanne had a cup of coffee on Sunday. Which is ridiculous for a couple reasons:

1.) Suzanne could have had coffee the day before.
2.) Caffeine is in lots of other things besides coffee and which Suzanne could have consumed i.e., soda, sports drink etc.

This is just more of the usual IE spin, grasping at straws, trying to sway public opinion/taint future jury pool and now since the AR was released- Damage Control.

IMHOO

#JusticeForSuzanne
 
Last edited:
It's very odd that IE didn't claim they were whisking away Suzanne's remains for their own autopsy. I am convinced there is some sort of strategy to it. Do they not want another autopsy because it will only confirm the findings, which point directly to BM? For the legal people, would the defense be required to provide those results during discovery, or just that it was done?

I hope LE has constant eyes on BM. We know he's a hothead. I wouldn't be suprised if he tried to pull some sort of shenanighans. Or has a temper trantrum that gets him trouble. Didn't he go on a mission with his chruch somewhere in S America or Africa? If he has enough money left, he may be in a position to at least try some sort of ruse like that.

MOO

The burden to prove BM guilty of any charges is on the State. The State's autopsy and the their expert witnesses would assist here.

However, if BM has evidence and experts that will be used to contradict the State's findings, he will have to discover this information to the prosecution.

The State has the right to know the identity of the expert witness, their credentials, and what they are being called to testify about. MOO
 
Last edited:
Just to clarify ; There are two boyfriends being posted about.
The youngest daughters boyfriend was at the puma path house and is on the police body cam video giving LE some very straightforward answers the day SM was reported missing
The other boyfriend is JL - Suzanne’s boyfriend/affair guy. A bunch of kids and wife back in Michigan. They went to high school together.
Imo
Yes! I believe most agree that as used here for our purposes, 'boyfriend' (BF) refers to the teen daughter, whereas SM had an affair partner (AP), who resides in Michigan (JL).
 
Because IE is trying to nail it to the timeline- Barry is innocent because Suzanne had a cup of coffee on Sunday. Which is ridiculous for a couple reasons:

1.) Suzanne could have had coffee the day before.
2.) Caffeine is in lots of other things besides coffee and which Suzanne could have consumed i.e., soda, sports drink etc.

This is just more of the usual IE spin, grasping at straws, trying to sway public opinion/taint future jury pool and now since the AR was released- Damage Control.

IMHOO

#JusticeForSuzanne

A note from Web MD about caffeine in the body and it's half-life. It is at half the highest value by about 6 hours after consumption.

I assume LE has used very sophisticated (GC-MS)mass spectroscopy and/ or liquid chromatography mass spec, or other newer more sophisticated techniques. If so, the amount of caffeine may be very very small, but just enough to be identifiable, and is really not much use in creating a timeline.
How long until caffeine is completely out of your system?

From WebMD:
You notice the effects of caffeine within 15 minutes. The levels in your bloodstream peak an hour later and remain there for several hours. About 6 hours after you consume caffeine, half of it is still in your body. Caffeine may not completely clear your bloodstream until after 10 hours.

 
BM has voluntarily dismissed his claims against the FBI Agents (Grusing and Harris), and Chaffee County Sheriff's Sergeant Hysjulien.
^^rsbm

BM DISMISSED Sgt Hysjulien from his civil suit.

Please take note of Sgt Hysjuliens very relevant answer (i.e., conclusory allegations) to BM's Complaint, as cited in the defendants Motion to Dismiss:

1714843597217.png

 
Last edited:
Yes, I think so. They already know what’s out there and can mitigate that information.
I also agree. And IANAL, yet IMO the entire civil case would merely seem a transparent effort to get at any additional evidence, perspectives, rationales, and police reports or analysis that might serve to be used in a trial or convict their client / prime suspect. In other words, to see how really ‘bad’ is it for BM?

And that leads me to continue to ponder what on earth Bury / BM might have told his criminal defense and civil attorneys? And sure would be interesting to have heard discussions he had with them once the remains of SM were found - and when the partial Autopsy Report was released. MOO
 
Last edited:
I still find it crazy ironic it was BAM, considering you being so well known for your BAM!'s here.
I mean, what are the odds? :oops:
I know right! Lol!!!

Seeing that he used the BAM on her, my feeling is, he had every intention of taking her life. My own opinion is he felt it was God taking care of her, being unfaithful to BM.

Back in 2021 he said:
"Maybe in God’s eyes this was his way of resolving something,” Morphew told investigators, according to the affidavit. “…I’ve had a very hard time understanding why God did this… But if I would have known this from the beginning, I wouldn’t had to suffer for nine months, not knowing why God did what he did. I’m not saying he did it to punish Suzanne because of her affair, but it makes more sense than what I knew before you guys came today."

When we listen to his words, we can "see" right through him.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
104
Guests online
3,162
Total visitors
3,266

Forum statistics

Threads
594,091
Messages
17,998,873
Members
229,308
Latest member
PRJ
Back
Top