Found Deceased CO - Suzanne Morphew, 49, Chaffee Co, 10 May 2020 *Case dismissed w prejudice* #104

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
You know, if I were Sho, I think I'd find myself being a bit careful around Barry. I wouldn't want to say anything that he might not like, about when we met, for instance. And if I were Barry, I think I'd find myself being a bit careful around Sho. I wouldn't want to say anything that she might not like, in case she might get upset, and perhaps say something to somebody about something or other. Ah, love, ain't it grand?

RBBM

Indeed.

Both Drew Peterson and Juran Vandersloot come to mind.

Joran van der Sloot: the story of a Dutch killer

Meet The Chicago Cop Who Was Imprisoned For Killing His Wife — And May Have Killed Another

JMVHO
 
I don’t think there are any remaining charges and the judge clarified he did not need an attorney to handle hunting season so once any remaining bills are paid it is over for the time being except charges related to any costs for probation. Obviously if another attempt is made related to Suzanne’s disappearance there will be costs again for defense. On the other hand he is no longer hindered by having to stay in Chaffee County and daily drives to download the data from electronic monitoring so can freely work. Denver does open up more possibilities. As far as his daughters they are all free and unencumbered by the emotional weight of the trial and the need to support their father to the degree that was required/needed.
The fact that there are no “remaining” charges at this time, ignores the fact that LE have substantial evidence in their possession and could come after him at any given moment. He is NOT truly free of the burden of Suzanne’s murder and when they come for him again the money will once again hemorrhage from his bank account. He’s not a bright bulb but he knows that much. As well, I don’t think for one minute that Denver PD are not keeping an eye on him if he indeed has moved to Denver. After some of the half truths and what I consider lies IE has put out there (MOO), I won’t believe he has actually moved to Denver until another source confirms it. MOO MOO MOO.

Sadly, his daughters will continue to feel the weight of his crime, even if they don’t believe he did it. Barry needs to be worshipped and IMHO he will continue to drain them emotionally whether they realize it or not. He craves his “supply” and I don’t think SD alone can fill his constant need to be elevated to the pedestal he has made for himself. Not to mention, the stigma of having a father that was arrested for murdering their mother is a burden. His case was not dismissed outright but without prejudice. In this day and age and social media as it is, it would be naive to think they can escape what their father has put on them by what he did.

More MOO.
 
I’d wager that at least 1/2 of that found it’s way directly into IE and DN’s bank account. And it isn’t over! MOO
One of our attorneys estimated BM's defense costs between $300,000 - $500,000. So, he may have spent her entire inheritance defending himself against the charge that he murdered her. Regardless, he ended up financially better off because she has been successfully concealed. Because the law does not recognize her death, estate law does not apply and the question whether BM is eligible to inherit her share of their joint assets (because murderers cannot inherit) never arose. So IMO, he profited very substantially from his actions. If she is found, another legal scenario may play itself out.
 
Thank you @Cindizzi -- also, appears we now have confirmation the other two charges were dismissed as part of the plea deal to admit to forgery.

Great that he had to plead to a felony

Absurdly light sentence compared to other US voter fraud cases, including people who cast their own ballot, believing in good faith they could vote.

LOL
 
[…]

"He knew that she wanted to vote and he thought that she might come back," said Iris Eytan, Morphew's attorney. "He didn’t know where she was. He was carrying out her wishes. What he did was he signed his name on the witness line, not concealing that it was him. He signed his signature on the witness line and he left the signature where she would normally sign blank. He did not make a mark there trying to deceive the clerk that by chance she had signed it. He did not sign or forge her name making it appear that she in fact signed it."

[…]

"He didn’t really intend to deceive, but what he did was make a mistake. He made a bad choice," Eytan said. "He didn’t think that he was doing anything against the law. When he received the ballot, he had legal guardianship over Suzanne. That means that he could sign property paperwork, tax paperwork, all sorts of documentation on her behalf. That was what was permitted by the courts."

Strange that he plead to a felony offence of forgery, yet according to his lawyer he "made a mistake"
 
Great that he had to plead to a felony

Absurdly light sentence compared to other US voter fraud cases, including people who cast their own ballot, believing in good faith they could vote.

LOL
Actually not. I posted a link to Colorado 4th district voter fraud cases and sentences before yesterdays outcome. The sentence was not that unusual. People wanted him to get a more severe sentence but most judges tend to stick to the middle of the bell curve unless there are very unusual circumstances. This case was pretty cut and dried in my opinion.
 
Actually not. I posted a link to Colorado 4th district voter fraud cases and sentences before yesterdays outcome. The sentence was not that unusual. People wanted him to get a more severe sentence but most judges tend to stick to the middle of the bell curve unless there are very unusual circumstances. This case was pretty cut and dried in my opinion.
I'm actually surprised it even went to a judge. He basically got the same thing a pretrial intervention would have amounted to here in FL. It's where a person with no record gets a year on probation and if they stay clean per the probation office the charge is dropped. Perhaps this is the equivalent there in CO.
 
I'm actually surprised it even went to a judge. He basically got the same thing a pretrial intervention would have amounted to here in FL. It's where a person with no record gets a year on probation and if they stay clean per the probation office the charge is dropped. Perhaps this is the equivalent there in CO.
I think there are differences in how states adjudicate. Colorado has a class 6 felony that is a misdemeanor in many states that might have 5 classes of felony. The states can be different for sure. Several have pointed out a woman in Texas who got a really stiff sentence that is going through appeals I think.
 
Barry surely had full confidence he could control Suzanne. Naturally HE wouldn't call it controlling but it is what it is. He controlled the money, the real estate, the family. What she wore, what she ate, how she cleaned.

We come to find out that Suzanne had a lovely family who loved her very much. He boxed them out.

The time for Suzanne to leave might've been 2018. If he would've let her. But she was torn. He makes threats. Suddenly she needed him for health coverage, with a new diagnosis. One daughter was still young, one was moving away.

Barry must've begged, threatened, cajoled, love bombed and guilted her mightily. Borrowed money from Gene, used Suzanne's inheritance to buy PP. (Indiana hadn't sold, was rented almost like a contract for deed, due 6/2020 or so.)

Once in Colorado it was WORSE than before. Suzanne was trying to white knuckle it until the Second's graduation
She actually believed there was a path forward, that he would let her go.

I think Suzanne saw the pending sale of the Indiana home as the opportunity to recover her inheritance, divorce, and live locally for that senior year.

Barry didn't see it that way. And have people know he couldn't control/satisfy his woman? Settle up accounts. Half and half, with Suzanne recovering her inheritance*, to boot? Not gonna happen. He put her off for months, years by refusing to talk about it, likely forcing her to recite all he'd done for her.

*Her inheritance, comingled so divorce court might consider it joint, but Barry acquired it then fraudulently because he clearly represented and understood it was her and all hers -- and made promises to give it back -- just didn't. And wasn't going to.

I still think something happened on the Wednesday that was too illuminating for Suzanne to ignore anymore.

Barry decided to stop her before she could take action.

If somehow she'd lived through Mother's Day and closed on the Indiana house, sadly she'd have learned he wasn't going to give her her money back, not then either. Not ever.

Divorce was never going to be an option with Barry. Not when he had tranquilizer darts lying around.

Why? What made him so special? Why couldn't he just divorce like normal people do every day?

Ego.

JMO
It’s clear that one of the reasons they moved from Indiana so quickly was because she wanted out of the marriage. I’m as sure as you are that Barry did love bomb her and promised he would change. As soon as they got to Colorado I think he let her know there would never be a divorce and he was in charge. I’m starting to see why Suzanne reached out to Jeff right after they arrived in Colorado. She had remembered their feelings when they were young. She likely felt safe with him. I’m sure she had to show Barry many “favors” to be allowed to take those trips she did.

It just makes your skin crawl to think of the ways he abused her and all the while behind her back, he was likely seeing other women, maybe SD, and spending money the ways he chose to and causing financial problems.

I pray he is charged with her murder soon, with an air tight case and never walks out of prison.
 
Strange that he plead to a felony offence of forgery, yet according to his lawyer he "made a mistake"
Just wait -- it gets worse!!

LS interprets the WebEx hearing on 7/21 and reports how after Iris presented her case, misstating the facts as she's known to do for BM (and what Judge Lama proved to buy hook, line, and sinker), Judge Murphy was compelled to ask Iris if he could and should rely on the affidavit she was putting to the court to be accurate.

It was Prosecutor Mark Hulbert that satisfied Judge Murphy that Murphy's recollection from the AA was accurate, and affirmed that BM did in fact submit SM's ballot, after checking the box for candidate Trump (and others). Hulbert also read from the AA, BM's statements that he did it because others cheat and he wanted to give him one more vote. MOO

See LS Youtube uploaded 7/22.
 
Just wait -- it gets worse!!

LS interprets the WebEx hearing on 7/21 and reports how after Iris presented her case, misstating the facts as she's known to do for BM (and what Judge Lama proved to buy hook, line, and sinker), Judge Murphy was compelled to ask Iris if he could and should rely on the affidavit she was putting to the court to be accurate.

It was Prosecutor Mark Hulbert that satisfied Judge Murphy that Murphy's recollection from the AA was accurate, and affirmed that BM did in fact submit SM's ballot, after checking the box for candidate Trump (and others). Hulbert also read from the AA, BM's statements that he did it because others cheat and he wanted to give him one more vote. MOO

See LS Youtube uploaded 7/22.
If Murphy wasn't removed from the case, I have little doubt that Barry Morphew is sitting in prison right now. He would have kept things on track, and wouldn't have allowed Iris to railroad him with circular logic and lies.

Murphy had no patience for this nonsense, and wouldn't have given in.

Yesterday's hearing shows that.
 

Morphew pleads guilty to forgery; Sarah joins me for a life update 7/21/22.​



7/22/22 upload:​

Take note this is Fox21 Reporter LS's interpretation of the WebEx proceeding held on 7/21 she was allowed to pool for other media live pursuant to Judge Murphy's Order granting Fox21 EMC.

However, this YT uploaded on 7/22 is NOT a pre-recorded viewing or audio of the WebEx. This is only LS's interpretation of what she viewed of the proceeding.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
172
Guests online
443
Total visitors
615

Forum statistics

Threads
608,277
Messages
18,237,180
Members
234,329
Latest member
AqueousEcho
Back
Top