girlhasnoname
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2018
- Messages
- 10,294
- Reaction score
- 133,125
1 yes, 2 yes, 3 yes, 4 no, with exception of Patrick Frazee, 5 hellz noThis puzzles me. I can't for the life of me understand what advantages BM (and now his attorneys) seeks from keeping his face off camera. My limited imagination struggles to see this, but I have a gut feeling it's important somehow.
1. Does BM have experience that has taught him his face is an open book, and without the ability physically to impose or at least distract the listener people will gain insight into his thoughts? Does the behavior say anything about his desire for - or obsession with - control?
2. Is BM so given to angry outbursts and physical violence when under stress that a video of him reacting to the events and statements made in court could provide evidence against him? Is this one reason a third member of the defense team had to be with him as he listened? To prevent him from turning the switch and interrupting?
3. Does BM have a history of avoiding public exposure?
4. Has anyone seen this behavior in another defendant?
5. Is it possible BM has an actual conscience, or the ability to feel shame?
This has been a good question from the beginning. Thanks to those of you who remind us.
MOO