*Verdigris
Revelation 21:4
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2012
- Messages
- 1,234
- Reaction score
- 8,183
I recall AM saying he asked two questions: 1) any sign of struggle in the house, and 2) was SM's phone located, to which the response was "no."
So, if one wanted to get a little more picayunish - maybe there wasn't any sign of a struggle, but there may have been signs of an "event" (or maybe a clean-up, after an event), but not necessarily signs of a struggle; in which case they'd still say no. Right?
(Anybody know what I mean?)
Also, can't LE simply flat-out lie, if they feel it's to protect the integrity of the investigation?
That's an actual question - I know I've read that before, but not sure how accurate it is.
MassGuy would know!