I can't find the post as I have to do some work that can't wait (much) but somewhere I know that someone or more than one person said he or she does not believe, even now, that the husband did it. While I don't feel that same way and there are times when I feel that there are posters on WS and other sites (OMG!) who are here just to stir up things or even as a purposeful effort to distract people from those who are or may be suspects in the future, I don't feel that way here and now, NOT that my opinion matters really except to me. I do know that if I believe someone is innocent based on the credible research I have read myself, etc. or even if I just DO, I still would say it, and I do support that and those who feel that way. There's a difference between believing something and NOT believing it but trying for less-than-honorable reasons (in my view) to distract or muddy the facts such as for some future jury member. Or, you know, whitewash a suspect's image that pretty much, as a result of the person's own, documented actions, resemble the floor contents of a horse stall in dire need of cleaning. Yes. Sometimes, all the primer and all the paint in the world couldn't make that happen, in MOO. I also think it would be so hard to believe in someone and then have the facts show you otherwise. Just MOO. There is no joy in any of this ever. Sadness and sometimes, we hope, legal justice and not allowing anyone else else to be hurt if we're really lucky. Take care, all. MOO.
