I am curious why so many here think there is so much evidence in this case. What solid facts have been reported in the news indicating that there are mountains of evidence? Are we just speculating or do we have proof? Really, I'm asking. Please link some sources.
These days, living in the age of digital tech, there will be a lot of evidence in just about any case. The more important question is (I think) is how much of the evidence is actually of
evidentiary value. For example, by now it's safe to assume LE has the phone records of SM, BM, and anyone working with or for BM on Mother's Day weekend, so that's MG, CC and JP (that we know of).
Phone records of at least 5 different people over a 2 day span (just for example's sake) means a LOT of digital evidence to comb through, and that's
just the phone records. And within those phone records, there are several categories to sort things into: social media use, social media private messaging, specific app use, email, phone calls, texts. All of that data has to be sorted, synced, discarded, included, etc., before the investigators even know if the (for example) 1,000 pages of digital evidence from 5 different phones, was of any evidentiary value to the case.
I will guess that most of it will not be of any use at all, but they won't know that until they go through it all (similar to receiving a thousand tips at the tip line, but until they're all followed up on, they might find they only had 1 single tip that was actionable). And that's just the phones.
There are also bank records, witness statements, GPS data, surveillance cam footage, any fitness tracker data, any physical evidence they pulled from the bike, her house, her car, his truck... and the list goes on. And on.
So yes for me it's a lot of speculation based on years of reading probable cause/arrest warrant affidavits & court transcripts, (and listening to the prosecution's opening statement the day the trial begins - those are usually so eye opening) and knowing the massive mountains of evidence investigators have to sift through to find the evidence that matters, and that is eventually included in the prosecution's case. It's a LOT of hard work, that's for sure. I don't see this case being any different.
jmo