Coincidences

[Ames]

Honored how??

I agree with everything that man says....except...I believe that Burke was NOT mistaken or confused when he said that JB was not asleep after arriving home from the White's party, and walked in on her own...and even helped to carry in Christmas presents. ST thinks that Burke was confused...and that she was actually brought in asleep...just like Patsy and John said she was.

 

[MurriFlower]

The exact same thing can be said for some IDI posters!! Relatives of the Ramseys, JR himself....etc.

IDIs don't usually last very long.

 

[Agatha_C]

Or they come back with a new HAT... Happens all the time on lots of sites....

 

[joeskidbeck]

Or they come back with a new HAT... Happens all the time on lots of sites....

One would hope when they came back with their new "hat" it would also be with a new theory that involved some common sense.

 

[Agatha_C]

different name same propaganda!

 

[MurriFlower]

One would hope when they came back with their new "hat" it would also be with a new theory that involved some common sense.

That exact same thing can be said for some RDI posters!! Folks with an axe to grind.

 

[joeskidbeck]

That exact same thing can be said for some RDI posters!! Folks with an axe to grind.

MF, I never said one word about IDI in that post. You have often told me not to put words in your mouth. I expect the same courtesy.

 

[SunnieRN]

That exact same thing can be said for some RDI posters!! Folks with an axe to grind.

What in heavens name do you mean by that statement? I don't know the Ramseys. I have never been to Boulder. What ax would I have to grind? Looking at a situation, studying that situation and coming to a conclusion does not mean someone has an ax to grind. It means they BELIEVE that they KNOW what occured during an incident. Just as you seem to feel. Our opinions just differ.

If you don't agree, it doesn't mean you have to be insulting.

 

[MurriFlower]

MF, I never said one word about IDI in that post. You have often told me not to put words in your mouth. I expect the same courtesy.

If you jump into a conversation, such as this one:

Originally Posted by Ames View Post
The exact same thing can be said for some IDI posters!! Relatives of the Ramseys, JR himself....etc.
MurriFlower: IDIs don't usually last very long.
Originally Posted by Agatha_C View Post
Or they come back with a new HAT... Happens all the time on lots of sites....
joeskidbeck: One would hope when they came back with their new "hat" it would also be with a new theory that involved some common sense.

Then don't complain when I attribute the thoughts you have offered "thanks for a useful post" and replying to, as being ones you are in agreement with.

If it wasn't IDI you were referring to when you said made the crack about "common sense" then you must have been referring to RDI??

 

[joeskidbeck]

If you jump into a conversation, such as this one:



Then don't complain when I attribute the thoughts you have offered "thanks for a useful post" and replying to, as being ones you are in agreement with.

If it wasn't IDI you were referring to when you said made the crack about "common sense" then you must have been referring to RDI??

Quite frankly, I was referring to anyone who can't post on a board for adults like an adult without being rude and condescending. Be they RDI, IDI, or OGKWDI. I don't care which. It gets really old when every word you say is treated with the same animosity. I have no problem with you. We disagree on who committed a crime, does that have to make us enemies? It doesn't to me.

 

[MurriFlower]

What in heavens name do you mean by that statement? I don't know the Ramseys. I have never been to Boulder. What ax would I have to grind? Looking at a situation, studying that situation and coming to a conclusion does not mean someone has an ax to grind. It means they BELIEVE that they KNOW what occured during an incident. Just as you seem to feel. Our opinions just differ.

If you don't agree, it doesn't mean you have to be insulting.

I was responding to this:

Originally Posted by Ames View Post
The exact same thing can be said for some IDI posters!! Relatives of the Ramseys, JR himself....etc.

belief that IDI must necessarily be associated with the Rs. It couldn't be further from the truth. I am removed by many thousands of miles and genes from anyone in the US.

To suggest that someone who doesn't agree with your theory has a 'vested interest' in their innocence by being either a relative or one of them, is a far worse suggestion than that some RDI have an 'axe to grind'.

However, if you choose to be insulted by what you read into what I have posted, then that is your privilege. You are constitutionally entitled to your erroneous opinion.

 

[SunnieRN]

I was responding to this:



belief that IDI must necessarily be associated with the Rs. It couldn't be further from the truth. I am removed by many thousands of miles and genes from anyone in the US.

To suggest that someone who doesn't agree with your theory has a 'vested interest' in their innocence by being either a relative or one of them, is a far worse suggestion than that some RDI have an 'axe to grind'.

However, if you choose to be insulted by what you read into what I have posted, then that is your privilege. You are constitutionally entitled to your erroneous opinion.

Wow, finally something we agree on! Thing is, my opinion obviously wasn't erroneous as you were rude to me once again. But in these great United States we are entitled to our own opinion. I thought it was the same in your country of 20% of the people committing 80% of the crimes.

 

[Agatha_C]

:Banane09::Banane09::Banane09::Banane09::Banane09::Banane09::Banane09:

 

[joeskidbeck]

Have you studied the US Constitution enough to know exactly what we are entitled to? It could very well be that it is your opinion that is erroneous.

 

[Agatha_C]

like that DNA, erroneous opinion has to be proven sunni, so you're cool.

 

[MurriFlower]

Have you studied the US Constitution enough to know exactly what we are entitled to? It could very well be that it is your opinion that is erroneous.

No, it means nothing to me, but I've been told often enough here about how in the US you can all write whatever you like about someone, true or false, and then just say it's your 'constitutionally protected opinion'. If this is not true, you might like to enlighten me. Not that it matters really, as you can get away with this in my country without being accused of libel if what you write is false.

 

[joeskidbeck]

No, it means nothing to me, but I've been told often enough here about how in the US you can all write whatever you like about someone, true or false, and then just say it's your 'constitutionally protected opinion'. If this is not true, you might like to enlighten me. Not that it matters really, as you can get away with this in my country without being accused of libel if what you write is false.

We cannot state as fact "anything we want" about anyone. What we state here is personal opinion and you cannot be sued for your opinion in this country. You can be sued for libel, which I believe, is the way it should be.

 

[MurriFlower]

We cannot state as fact "anything we want" about anyone. What we state here is personal opinion and you cannot be sued for your opinion in this country. You can be sued for libel, which I believe, is the way it should be.

So isn't libel defined as

"defamation by written or printed words, pictures, or in any form other than by spoken words or gestures.
b.
the act or crime of publishing it.
c.
a formal written declaration or statement, as one containing the allegations of a plaintiff or the grounds of a charge.
2.
anything that is defamatory or that maliciously or damagingly misrepresents. "

and isn't this a public forum??

 

[SunnieRN]

So isn't libel defined as

"defamation by written or printed words, pictures, or in any form other than by spoken words or gestures.
b.
the act or crime of publishing it.
c.
a formal written declaration or statement, as one containing the allegations of a plaintiff or the grounds of a charge.
2.
anything that is defamatory or that maliciously or damagingly misrepresents. "

and isn't this a public forum??

The main difference is freedom of speech MF.

When you are in a public forum, with your peers, in discussions on subjects, you have the right to your opinions. This is your right as a citizen of this country.

 

[MurriFlower]

The main difference is freedom of speech MF.

When you are in a public forum, with your peers, in discussions on subjects, you have the right to your opinions. This is your right as a citizen of this country.

Speech and writing are two separate things.

I'm not of the opinion that anyone should be able to wrongly accuse another of a crime. Written or spoken.