THANK YOU VERY MUCH Mrs. G Norris! Finally I get to see/read what is reported to be AL's authored Book of Granny!
I have to ask, after reviewing the "Public Safety" document which describes the Book of Granny book, why the second co-author/creator to the book was *blackened out* in the official document? Why is the second co-author's identity being protected? Could it possibly be AL's *mom, NL* who's the coauthor to AL's seeming violent book?
E.g. 1, the following is a preface about the Book of Granny, " On 08/16/13, I was assigned to review documents returned from the FBI-Behavioral Analysis Unit. A review of box #3 of 5 boxes revealed a spiral bound booklet called "The Big Book of Granny" ,
which appeared to be created by the shooter and [words blackened out by LE]...
E.g. 2, page A222 there is a drawing (which I assume is the cover of the Granny book) of Granny with her arm extended pointing her cane in a horizontal direction (as if she's using cane to shoot/arm herself against someone) and the words "
Granny is a trademark symbol of [blacked out words by LE]...the creator, Adam Lanza holds all rights to all of the following content, [blacked out words by LE] is the creator of the Granny Picture and holds all right to it."
My questions are:
1) Why is the second co-author/creator to the Big Book of Granny blackened out by LE?
2) Why are they protecting this second author?
3) Could the second co-author to the book be AL's mom, NL?
On the other hand, when I read the so-called jokes about Granny and the descriptions of the stories written about Granny by AL and some other co-author whose name was blackened out by LE, the book sounded like cartoons with characters such as Loony Tunes Elmer Fudd trying to shoot Bugs Bunny, or Wiley Coyote getting squashed by boulders but the "victims" of the shooting/dropped boulders would get up unharmed and be able to carry on as if nothing happened...Violent yet silly fantastical, improbable stories. I suppose in elementary school, watching such cartoons might have given rise to AL's Book of Granny and might not have necessarily appear to be morbid or violent to a parent of such a child...except for the fact that this child was specifically AL and he had mental issues (for which I have no idea whether or not by that age he was diagnosed or being treated).
Essentially, what I'm saying is that writing and/or drawing cartoon characters about violence and murder and mayhem does not necessarily translate to violent, gruesome, heinous, criminal behaviors *in real life*. Just take a look at Stephen King and other fiction writers of murder mysteries. Stephen King even stated in an interview that he thought of gruesome things all his life. Writing about morbid stuff could simply be a creative outlet to help authors release their inner demons -- frustrations/anger/negative emotions. So writing about morbid horrific things don't necessarily equal a violent murderer in the making.
What I do find disturbing is that *if* an adult such as NL was the co-author to AL's Granny book AND this adult was made aware by medical professionals that AL "lacked empathy" and "took everything literally", then the adult had encouraged the wrong behaviors/cognitions in AL and such encouragement could potentially have galvanized AL to act out his violent thoughts.
Nonetheless I still believe that the mom NL underestimated the degree of mental deficiencies in AL and wanted to believe, despite AL's social problems, that her son was "normal". She also overestimated her own abilities to help her son...
So yes, again, I believe NL was in serious denial. And I still don't hold her accountable to AL's violence because AL was 20 years old, an adult who apparently understood the moral implications of right and wrong and nonetheless AL made the singular choice to kill not only innocent schoolchildren/staff but also his own mother who tried real hard to bond with him and help break him out of his shell.